blog General Index
("But I'm wrong cave, and no more than a little copper and glass that I take for gold and diamonds ". Renè Descartes )
Miscellaneous
develop
In this issue F item
OPINION ON FOOD AND DRINK "DIET", "LIGHT", "low calorie" or "DIET"
Since consumer demand for food had "not fattening" a myriad of companies around the world, set themselves the task of developing lucrative food and beverage vested in the names given in the title of these paragraphs.
knew that the market was huge and basically very lucrative .
We have calculated, with a patient advocate (and do not think we're very wrong), that about fat-obesity move in the world something like two hundred fifty billion dollars a year (this calculation was made in 1999, as the surgeries are not included.)
Obviously everyone wants to raise some of this fabulous fortune.
The "Dietary Products Companies" would not be out of "business" of course.
For decades, food and beverage outlets "low calorie" in order to be consumed by those who are weight loss plan, or those who, frightened by her weight, they decide not to aggravate it.
Millions of tons of them have been consumed in base the attractive advertisements that recommended them. The
of milk, yogurt and cottage cheese, is a striking example.
Cleverly, advertisers show, for example, the sculpted bodies of girls who use their "famous Light Yogurt." The meta-message is: "If you eat may acquire these graceful figure of teen models.
is why the vast majority are acquired.
But again (and they're talking about a .....) fallacy.
Evidence tells me there are only four types of products that actually meet the precept of "no fat", or hinder the process of weight loss:
- Artificial sweeteners not powder.
- Gums "Diet", "Light" or "Free".
- The no-carb gelatin and
- The multinational soft drink nut warmly Cola, Lemon-Lime or, as explained in the fifteenth Hypothesis.
Everything else is not true. Puddings, desserts, fruit-flavored sodas, to noodles, pizzas and pastries, I've seen sell under the name that credits its position "antiengordantes." I
angry with that attitude of the manufacturers, but what can one do?
Alguna vez a algún empresario muy astuto se le ocurrió anotar en las etiquetas de los aceites que fabricaba, el rótulo “SIN COLESTEROL”, por lo que todo el mundo comenzó a consumirlos en detrimento de las otras marcas. Sus competidores se vieron, entonces, en la obligación de incinerar millones de etiquetas ya impresas, para elaborar otras que también dijeran lo mismo. Pero ocurre que los aceites vegetales no pueden contener colesterol , ya que este es un producto de exclusivo origen animal.
Ante la pregunta del por qué de esa actitud ellos responderían con otra:
–¿Los aceites vegetales tienen colesterol?
–¡No!
"So, what is sin if I explicit on their labels?
course "there is no sin." Say, eg, a mineral water brand "does not contain glucose, is true, but it suggests the need to consume the other if they could get to have it, so you must drink, preferably, stating that their absence. But that's not ethical! Old and trite
this topic of "Marketing."
foods and beverages "low calorie" are not, the vast majority, or slimming or antiengordantes. Are just a gimmick for you to purchase. These comments could
bring me problems, they said my wife and my children when they read the draft, but was convinced that what I want (another of my utopia) is that there are companies starting to develop elements "Without absorbable carbohydrates for humans , and this is true . It would be a great business
Please: Those who sell mineral water and sodas, refrain.
special precautions should be taken with bread products that are labeled "bran" or "gluten (gluten is the protein found in wheat, oats, barley and rye, and who have celiac BAN). These products are not ... but WITH ... Can not be baked or bran or gluten if it is incorporated starch. In fact nothing can be "baked" without starch. Then all you baked it contains.
And very careful with foods whose labels say "sugar." For those who do sciences (physicians, veterinarians, biochemists, pharmacists ...), word "sugar" is synonymous carbohydrate (as "carb" or "carb"), for other people, is "the product of the sugar cane or sugar beets." Then, slyly, candy or manufacturers, and many drinks they called "diet", recorded on their cigarette packs and labels "without sugar" , and it certainly does not contain "sucrose" (the name of sugar that is commonly used in every house in the world) but other types of carbohydrates (sugars) are absorbed in the intestine as glucose, as he himself as sugar cane.
Next delivery: "Hypothesis on the feeding of pregnant women."
0 comments:
Post a Comment