blog index for
(- Is there anyone else that poorly nourished pregnant women?
"Yes ... two pregnant women)
MISCELLANEOUS
In this issue at the subject G
HYPOTHESIS ON THE FEEDING OF PREGNANT
Not many people are fed worse than pregnant women. It has always been the culture that has led to the terrible food to which all are subject (culture is who gives us all the wisdom, but also all the bad habits).
The archaic advice to eat "the double "because it is creating a new being, seems to be timeless, because now and for thousands of years is still" blindly. "
The major problem is that pregnant women now have in hand a number of food and drink unholy that they had a few centuries ago.
The wide variety of carbohydrate-based components available today, is changing the food in a mess. And "craving" works. That appetite bizarre that all manifest, and that medicine is called pica , always oriented, casually eating carbohydrates.
The "strawberries with whipped cream" of all stories and gags for television and film, are the perfect example.
the need to perform caesarean sections, which is increasing every year, could, in my view, be one of its consequences.
women Everything is carefully prepared to breed and bear children, as we have mentioned. The work of natural history with respect to the perpetuation of the human species has been great. But it's up to "them" when they meet this great feature ...
Since I was very young, pregnant women have shocked me, amazed me, I have filled with tenderness.
But for twenty-eight, besides all that, I'm scared.
When I started to get in touch with all the conflict in the Food, warned that pregnant women are almost always the most problematic patients.
not say how many hundreds of them have asked me asking help and advice to "in this pregnancy does not happen as in the above", where increased weight or bad (for obvious reasons, this is totally useless to talk measures and slenderness).
Of these, only fifty spend the entire pregnancy that passed by going to my office every two weeks and watch your diet as I always recommend.
You might think that something else a few hundred fifty is a very high percentage, but I must remind you that they have to go through just six or seven months, which are the only of my patients that have a date certain for completion of their "food intensive care" and that absolutely all have, exclusively, four eyes that "watch" means your obstetrician and mine. (The torque corresponding to the spouses does not count, since most of the time are the ones who provide the famous strawberries and cream. ")
Let's get a little more serious.
Many of them come to the first query very worried. In general have gone through the same situation one or more times, and have not fared well with respect to the claims of their obstetricians refer to the maximum weight recommended them (although many of them are very forgiving.)
Twelve to fifteen kilos heavier at the end of the pregnancy scare . Poor, are so used to huge increases that have come to congratulate some "because only have increased fourteen". Let
accounts based on a woman to conceive is thin. What
take a few minutes more before delivery compared to what I had at the time of conception?
- birth weight baby (Average): 3.200 kg
- Placenta (more or less): 800 gr.
- Amniotic fluid (also more or less): 1.000 kg
- Enlargement of breasts, which are prepared to feed the new baby (approx.): 1.000 kg
- Retention of water in both lower limbs by venous congestion produced by the pressure of the fetus in the inferior vena cava (similar to what we saw in the eighth hypothesis). This is because the woman is the only female of the building that runs throughout her pregnancy walking upright, causing venous stasis and consequent edema (maybe exaggerating a bit): 2.000 kg
The sum is very simple, and the result gives us eight kilos, so more than that has not of being "good thing" (let us allow nine , not to be so drastic. But no more!)
A good percentage of everything that rises above the nine kilos will go to your baby fat and , I say, what need is there to submit to a stress at the time of his birth, much bigger than it already is doomed, as discussed early, forcing him to be born with an extra pound of fat that will surely never to need.
- My son at birth weighed four hundred kilos! - Claim many mothers, with "pride."
What is the benefit they do with that amount of extra fat? Then, what is the reason for this excess of joy if all you could get to bring only problems are: to diarrhea, for example, will dehydrate more quickly than if they did.
is likely that by now you feel any guilt for having gained too much weight in their pregnancies, or being too fat right now and producing a new child.
try, where possible, to dispel that guilt is explaining why the sometimes excessive, weight gain in pregnancy.
all feel guilty about their excessive fat in that stage of their lives. Moreover, they defend their right to feel guilt. - Why such things I know I gain weight if I am aware that I not only hurt me but, worse, also my baby? I protest. But that has an explanation.
The woman is the only female of all creation who has sex while pregnant. There is no other exception in the entire animal kingdom.
Nature has given to all female special devices to prevent contact during pregnancy carnal, and males have the instinct need to shun such contact in such circumstances.
Our intelligence has been developed at the expense of canceling our ancestral instincts. But some, if only a trace of him has to stay, I guess. This, for example, in women, the avoidance of intercourse while pregnant.
But the culture tells us that pregnancy is no impediment to sex. And neither the man nor the woman see pregnancy as an obstacle to carry them out. But this "remnant of instinct", that atavism in women, completely unaware idea mechanisms to evade them.
And one of them is fat. And another diminish the quality and frequency of personal hygiene (in general, of course. There will always be exceptions). Why do you think, if not, that most women were carious teeth during pregnancy. Is it because the blood carries them to manufacture bones calcium to the fetus? No, woman, that wants the fetus has little calcium dentin, which happens to tell him combined to form insoluble compounds or even have blood vessels that could take it, having more than three kilos in the other bones and eating, for nine months, huge amounts of it.
The teeth decay because they are washed much less, despite eating many more carbs than usual, or wash with the same frequency as before, but wrong.
And bathe less often, and are arranged under (not all but most ...)
And why all this.
As for something very simple: BE SEXUALLY DESAPETECIBLES .
There must be something in the unconscious of women treated to prevent the "contacts" in times of gestation.
very much I have confessed in the privacy of the consultation, though crazy love to her husband at the time of pregnancy had for him a very special and inexplicable rejection.
You can argue that never felt a similar feeling, indeed, a few have told me that in those days increased sexual desire. But, my friend, that has occurred in his consciousness, what the heck knows what actually happened in her unconscious with the "primitive instinct to reject the relationships in times of pregnancy.
But this conflict also has a solution.
If you are pregnant or plan to become pregnant ask you read this scenario with her husband. Talk both about the subject. Share your concerns with your gynecologist or obstetrician. I am sure he will agree only to maintain relations only when you dispose it. It is for the good of all three: you, your husband and child in the womb.
My experience tells me that when the couple and I discussed this subject, Things start to take more orderly (a compulsion to eat something fattening, I mean.)
good news and also a product of the famous "Evidence."
Most pregnant women over fifty who attended the consultation time and were careful as we agreed, told me with amazement (higher in gilts that were not) that your new baby and did not need to eat every two or three hours , as is almost universal rule.
This fact, when I began to notice her often caught my attention.
I asked a friend, who by then was head of Quality Control of a milk pasteurization plant in the city, they did analyze the milk of mothers who did not eat carbohydrates and they did so freely, so what I tried the samples needed.
The results were surprising: the milk of mothers who were not consuming carbohydrates had a 22% less lactose and about 20% less fat (and, of course, a higher proportion of protein) than that " ate everything. " That makes your food to be greater, that is evacuated from the stomach of her little more slowly, and they do not gain weight as much as those of mothers who do not see any care.
For all that, the cramps disappeared so troublesome that afflict all babies, which are produced by foam forming in your intestines the similar amount of lactose containing the milk of mothers living eating carbohydrates. And this is the most attractive for all moms, after the blowjob last night - some for just a few days after birth, "sleeping" one pull "between five and seven hours, which for all was a blessing from heaven.
For the sake of his son, and for your peace of night, try not to eat TYPE THREE during the term of suckling, the DOS TYPE in the measures listed in the fifteenth Hypothesis, and type one of the times desired. If any while consuming more than a little concentrated carbohydrates, your child has to reproach with tears because of his intestinal cramping the next day.
If power is the way I advised: All happy!
0 comments:
Post a Comment