Delivery extra for Christmas Delivery
MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL VISITORS OF THE BLOG!
Yes, everyone, and also to future readers.
A big kiss to my new friends.
And a greeting, in the order of appearance to:
Maria Dolors (the Mariloli of Barcelona),
Eduardo Ferreyra (Córdoba, Argentina),
Duckling,
David,
Marta,
Gloria (the Chilean girl)
Claudia,
Hokulom,
María Isabel (Maribel),
Lucia
Guadalupe,
Elena,
Blue
Carme,
Maria Carme,
Pilar (Pilar), Rebecca
Revert
Juan Carlos,
Soraya,
Mariluz (Marta),
Inma,
Adrian
Erikena,
Blue
Psychologist (anonymous)
Agnes
Bethlehem
Gabrielus (the Santa Fe-cap beer-),
Irene (Badajoz) Carmen
(Caballito),
Eduardo (the other, not "Ferreyra Córdoba),
Mariela,
Marypili,
Adrian
Claudiafuegoazul,
that was that,
Maria Carme (Mallorca).
And all the "anonymous", which even gave me a name other than their own.
My God, how many are!
And I thought that only communicate with me three or four.
I will never forget the year 2006. Has given me a lot of new friends (some that I have learned to love as if you knew for years they know who they are-), and all thanks to my son Marcelo, who first got me into this quixotic.
May 2007 be even better than the 2006. What comforts me and makes me happy is that I know, positively, which for many will be, because they have managed to find himself.
May God bless you all!
The new friend of yours:
Dr. Cesareo Rodriguez (So send what you like ...)
Saturday, December 23, 2006
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Happy Poppins For Eevee
twenty-five
(this is the time for autographs, and then the Epilogue. But you have to fight so easily from me, the blog will continue. There are more things that we need to talk)
Let us have faith.
Next delivery: "Decalogue of the correct treatment for thinning
(this is the time for autographs, and then the Epilogue. But you have to fight so easily from me, the blog will continue. There are more things that we need to talk)
dedicate this paper to Marita, my wife and my sons Marc, Paul and Mary Lelis, for having supported us in understanding and criticism.
His understanding shown to excuse the time to devote to the book first and then to this blog, in my office hours, we rest to share with them.
His criticism, because as the required four prospective readers of each scenario, were able to accurately comment on the errors they found in each.
And because, thank God, I feel always at my side.
To my patients, who have forgiven me on the cover of the blog, next author's name, not the traditional figure "et al." , without whose help this work would not have been possible. I shall be forever indebted to them for that omission.
To all who read the blog (and future readers), thanking them for their comments and concerns.
And a special mention to Maria Dolores, of Barcelona, \u200b\u200bwhich I can only say thanks .
IN MEMORY OF:
Three of my great teachers. Three of my archetypes:
Professor Dr. Juan Pedro Picena: because I was taught that a good doctor is the one who loves his patients rather than the same medicine.
Dr. Professor Guillermo del Sel Ferrari, because he learned that a doctor who thinks differently from the official, is strictly prohibited shut up. Dr. Juan José
Gianni: it was he who introduced me to the magical adventure of "doctor-patient relationship."
And in tribute to someone who did not have the happiness to know, but you did, I know, we had become close friends: Dr. Carl Sagan. He confirmed that my old ideas about the skepticism and against the dogma, were not simply the product of a fiery youthful imagination, but the purest of truths.
EPILOGUE
After observing for years the attitudes of overweight patients struggling with her weight, and the professionals engaged in those duties, continues to amaze me to discover that nothing positive has been achieved Despite all attempts. That this ancient board
"First do no harm" , has only been followed by a few colleagues, and that shortage is very serious. Even more serious would be the continued lack for attention.
is very little that we have done so far by the obese. I accept that.
Nor is much that we're getting to the hemetómanos and Afag. Also I admit.
But we must all accept that there is much that we can try not to worsen their condition. And although we have all the time ahead to start doing things right, we must realize that as goes through all, we urge them to start.
My utopia is that the wall in front of each desk of the doctors who are dedicated to treating overweight patients, it is written in large legible letters, primum non nocere who taught the Old Masters Medicine.
The fat does not consult us because they displace being fat, but because suffer because of it. Unable
continue cheating their enthusiasm with unnatural treatments.
is unfair to try to convince them they are sick and normalize the attitude and medicate with drugs, ALL KNOW have more contraindications and cause more harm than the very fat.
not moral to be given to taking drugs that no doctor in their right mind would prescribe it to his wife or any of their children.
is inhuman that they reinforce the blame for their lack of adherence to the utopian policies that are given, without even trying to find out why secret of this "insult", especially when the signs were not in themselves fulfill.
not right, to my way of seeing things, subjecting them to tremendous and costly surgeries to them obviously pretending that "their lack of willpower."
would be great if we spent as much time to listen, to help ... Or, even if only for comfort.
would be nice and comforting to see disappear before our eyes, query to query, the fault that has tortured until the day he decided to ask our advice.
would be heroic and almost magical in the last end, can you just say, sincerely and boldly, without any shame or intellectual urgency: "I can not do anything for you ... I do not know how. I advise you to consult with someone more experienced than me. Many
follow slavishly, academic streams because they have not had a Ferrari of Sel has taught them that if they think differently should remember that doctors themselves are that if the medicine has progressed thanks to the doctors have shouted their truths no matter who wounded or against what structures are confronted, they have banned silence their opinions ... I feel so sorry.
servile attitude toward teachers is a thousand times worse than rebellion and disobedience, much worse than the lack of respect towards them prohibits us from the Hippocratic oath.
and avail ourselves of this attitude for the sole purpose of making money, rather than denigrate us utter poverty. Because humans can adapt to material poverty, but poverty will eventually debase ethics. And we will become more vile than having intellectual wealth, we accept the general view because, quite simply, is more comfortable, profitable and bit embarrassing.
dogma only serves to religions.
Medicine is not a religion: it is just a living science (perhaps the liveliest of all the sciences), which like all living things grow but never die ... at least not before the death of the last of the men.
Poor doctor who unknowingly hurt.
God help the doctor hurts knowing that hurts.
And to enlighten all who covered in the sad condition of dogmatic resists with all his forces as benevolent skepticism.
His understanding shown to excuse the time to devote to the book first and then to this blog, in my office hours, we rest to share with them.
His criticism, because as the required four prospective readers of each scenario, were able to accurately comment on the errors they found in each.
And because, thank God, I feel always at my side.
To my patients, who have forgiven me on the cover of the blog, next author's name, not the traditional figure "et al." , without whose help this work would not have been possible. I shall be forever indebted to them for that omission.
To all who read the blog (and future readers), thanking them for their comments and concerns.
And a special mention to Maria Dolores, of Barcelona, \u200b\u200bwhich I can only say thanks .
IN MEMORY OF:
Three of my great teachers. Three of my archetypes:
Professor Dr. Juan Pedro Picena: because I was taught that a good doctor is the one who loves his patients rather than the same medicine.
Dr. Professor Guillermo del Sel Ferrari, because he learned that a doctor who thinks differently from the official, is strictly prohibited shut up. Dr. Juan José
Gianni: it was he who introduced me to the magical adventure of "doctor-patient relationship."
And in tribute to someone who did not have the happiness to know, but you did, I know, we had become close friends: Dr. Carl Sagan. He confirmed that my old ideas about the skepticism and against the dogma, were not simply the product of a fiery youthful imagination, but the purest of truths.
EPILOGUE
After observing for years the attitudes of overweight patients struggling with her weight, and the professionals engaged in those duties, continues to amaze me to discover that nothing positive has been achieved Despite all attempts. That this ancient board
"First do no harm" , has only been followed by a few colleagues, and that shortage is very serious. Even more serious would be the continued lack for attention.
is very little that we have done so far by the obese. I accept that.
Nor is much that we're getting to the hemetómanos and Afag. Also I admit.
But we must all accept that there is much that we can try not to worsen their condition. And although we have all the time ahead to start doing things right, we must realize that as goes through all, we urge them to start.
My utopia is that the wall in front of each desk of the doctors who are dedicated to treating overweight patients, it is written in large legible letters, primum non nocere who taught the Old Masters Medicine.
The fat does not consult us because they displace being fat, but because suffer because of it. Unable
continue cheating their enthusiasm with unnatural treatments.
is unfair to try to convince them they are sick and normalize the attitude and medicate with drugs, ALL KNOW have more contraindications and cause more harm than the very fat.
not moral to be given to taking drugs that no doctor in their right mind would prescribe it to his wife or any of their children.
is inhuman that they reinforce the blame for their lack of adherence to the utopian policies that are given, without even trying to find out why secret of this "insult", especially when the signs were not in themselves fulfill.
not right, to my way of seeing things, subjecting them to tremendous and costly surgeries to them obviously pretending that "their lack of willpower."
would be great if we spent as much time to listen, to help ... Or, even if only for comfort.
would be nice and comforting to see disappear before our eyes, query to query, the fault that has tortured until the day he decided to ask our advice.
would be heroic and almost magical in the last end, can you just say, sincerely and boldly, without any shame or intellectual urgency: "I can not do anything for you ... I do not know how. I advise you to consult with someone more experienced than me. Many
follow slavishly, academic streams because they have not had a Ferrari of Sel has taught them that if they think differently should remember that doctors themselves are that if the medicine has progressed thanks to the doctors have shouted their truths no matter who wounded or against what structures are confronted, they have banned silence their opinions ... I feel so sorry.
servile attitude toward teachers is a thousand times worse than rebellion and disobedience, much worse than the lack of respect towards them prohibits us from the Hippocratic oath.
and avail ourselves of this attitude for the sole purpose of making money, rather than denigrate us utter poverty. Because humans can adapt to material poverty, but poverty will eventually debase ethics. And we will become more vile than having intellectual wealth, we accept the general view because, quite simply, is more comfortable, profitable and bit embarrassing.
dogma only serves to religions.
Medicine is not a religion: it is just a living science (perhaps the liveliest of all the sciences), which like all living things grow but never die ... at least not before the death of the last of the men.
Poor doctor who unknowingly hurt.
God help the doctor hurts knowing that hurts.
And to enlighten all who covered in the sad condition of dogmatic resists with all his forces as benevolent skepticism.
Let us have faith.
Next delivery: "Decalogue of the correct treatment for thinning
Sunday, December 17, 2006
Can Chewing Gum Recede Gums
Delivery Delivery Delivery twenty-four twenty-three
blog index for
(- Is there anyone else that poorly nourished pregnant women?
"Yes ... two pregnant women)
MISCELLANEOUS
In this issue at the subject G
HYPOTHESIS ON THE FEEDING OF PREGNANT
Not many people are fed worse than pregnant women. It has always been the culture that has led to the terrible food to which all are subject (culture is who gives us all the wisdom, but also all the bad habits).
The archaic advice to eat "the double "because it is creating a new being, seems to be timeless, because now and for thousands of years is still" blindly. "
The major problem is that pregnant women now have in hand a number of food and drink unholy that they had a few centuries ago.
The wide variety of carbohydrate-based components available today, is changing the food in a mess. And "craving" works. That appetite bizarre that all manifest, and that medicine is called pica , always oriented, casually eating carbohydrates.
The "strawberries with whipped cream" of all stories and gags for television and film, are the perfect example.
the need to perform caesarean sections, which is increasing every year, could, in my view, be one of its consequences.
women Everything is carefully prepared to breed and bear children, as we have mentioned. The work of natural history with respect to the perpetuation of the human species has been great. But it's up to "them" when they meet this great feature ...
Since I was very young, pregnant women have shocked me, amazed me, I have filled with tenderness.
But for twenty-eight, besides all that, I'm scared.
When I started to get in touch with all the conflict in the Food, warned that pregnant women are almost always the most problematic patients.
not say how many hundreds of them have asked me asking help and advice to "in this pregnancy does not happen as in the above", where increased weight or bad (for obvious reasons, this is totally useless to talk measures and slenderness).
Of these, only fifty spend the entire pregnancy that passed by going to my office every two weeks and watch your diet as I always recommend.
You might think that something else a few hundred fifty is a very high percentage, but I must remind you that they have to go through just six or seven months, which are the only of my patients that have a date certain for completion of their "food intensive care" and that absolutely all have, exclusively, four eyes that "watch" means your obstetrician and mine. (The torque corresponding to the spouses does not count, since most of the time are the ones who provide the famous strawberries and cream. ")
Let's get a little more serious.
Many of them come to the first query very worried. In general have gone through the same situation one or more times, and have not fared well with respect to the claims of their obstetricians refer to the maximum weight recommended them (although many of them are very forgiving.)
Twelve to fifteen kilos heavier at the end of the pregnancy scare . Poor, are so used to huge increases that have come to congratulate some "because only have increased fourteen". Let
accounts based on a woman to conceive is thin. What
take a few minutes more before delivery compared to what I had at the time of conception?
- birth weight baby (Average): 3.200 kg
- Placenta (more or less): 800 gr.
- Amniotic fluid (also more or less): 1.000 kg
- Enlargement of breasts, which are prepared to feed the new baby (approx.): 1.000 kg
- Retention of water in both lower limbs by venous congestion produced by the pressure of the fetus in the inferior vena cava (similar to what we saw in the eighth hypothesis). This is because the woman is the only female of the building that runs throughout her pregnancy walking upright, causing venous stasis and consequent edema (maybe exaggerating a bit): 2.000 kg
The sum is very simple, and the result gives us eight kilos, so more than that has not of being "good thing" (let us allow nine , not to be so drastic. But no more!)
A good percentage of everything that rises above the nine kilos will go to your baby fat and , I say, what need is there to submit to a stress at the time of his birth, much bigger than it already is doomed, as discussed early, forcing him to be born with an extra pound of fat that will surely never to need.
- My son at birth weighed four hundred kilos! - Claim many mothers, with "pride."
What is the benefit they do with that amount of extra fat? Then, what is the reason for this excess of joy if all you could get to bring only problems are: to diarrhea, for example, will dehydrate more quickly than if they did.
is likely that by now you feel any guilt for having gained too much weight in their pregnancies, or being too fat right now and producing a new child.
try, where possible, to dispel that guilt is explaining why the sometimes excessive, weight gain in pregnancy.
all feel guilty about their excessive fat in that stage of their lives. Moreover, they defend their right to feel guilt. - Why such things I know I gain weight if I am aware that I not only hurt me but, worse, also my baby? I protest. But that has an explanation.
The woman is the only female of all creation who has sex while pregnant. There is no other exception in the entire animal kingdom.
Nature has given to all female special devices to prevent contact during pregnancy carnal, and males have the instinct need to shun such contact in such circumstances.
Our intelligence has been developed at the expense of canceling our ancestral instincts. But some, if only a trace of him has to stay, I guess. This, for example, in women, the avoidance of intercourse while pregnant.
But the culture tells us that pregnancy is no impediment to sex. And neither the man nor the woman see pregnancy as an obstacle to carry them out. But this "remnant of instinct", that atavism in women, completely unaware idea mechanisms to evade them.
And one of them is fat. And another diminish the quality and frequency of personal hygiene (in general, of course. There will always be exceptions). Why do you think, if not, that most women were carious teeth during pregnancy. Is it because the blood carries them to manufacture bones calcium to the fetus? No, woman, that wants the fetus has little calcium dentin, which happens to tell him combined to form insoluble compounds or even have blood vessels that could take it, having more than three kilos in the other bones and eating, for nine months, huge amounts of it.
The teeth decay because they are washed much less, despite eating many more carbs than usual, or wash with the same frequency as before, but wrong.
And bathe less often, and are arranged under (not all but most ...)
And why all this.
As for something very simple: BE SEXUALLY DESAPETECIBLES .
There must be something in the unconscious of women treated to prevent the "contacts" in times of gestation.
very much I have confessed in the privacy of the consultation, though crazy love to her husband at the time of pregnancy had for him a very special and inexplicable rejection.
You can argue that never felt a similar feeling, indeed, a few have told me that in those days increased sexual desire. But, my friend, that has occurred in his consciousness, what the heck knows what actually happened in her unconscious with the "primitive instinct to reject the relationships in times of pregnancy.
But this conflict also has a solution.
If you are pregnant or plan to become pregnant ask you read this scenario with her husband. Talk both about the subject. Share your concerns with your gynecologist or obstetrician. I am sure he will agree only to maintain relations only when you dispose it. It is for the good of all three: you, your husband and child in the womb.
My experience tells me that when the couple and I discussed this subject, Things start to take more orderly (a compulsion to eat something fattening, I mean.)
good news and also a product of the famous "Evidence."
Most pregnant women over fifty who attended the consultation time and were careful as we agreed, told me with amazement (higher in gilts that were not) that your new baby and did not need to eat every two or three hours , as is almost universal rule.
This fact, when I began to notice her often caught my attention.
I asked a friend, who by then was head of Quality Control of a milk pasteurization plant in the city, they did analyze the milk of mothers who did not eat carbohydrates and they did so freely, so what I tried the samples needed.
The results were surprising: the milk of mothers who were not consuming carbohydrates had a 22% less lactose and about 20% less fat (and, of course, a higher proportion of protein) than that " ate everything. " That makes your food to be greater, that is evacuated from the stomach of her little more slowly, and they do not gain weight as much as those of mothers who do not see any care.
For all that, the cramps disappeared so troublesome that afflict all babies, which are produced by foam forming in your intestines the similar amount of lactose containing the milk of mothers living eating carbohydrates. And this is the most attractive for all moms, after the blowjob last night - some for just a few days after birth, "sleeping" one pull "between five and seven hours, which for all was a blessing from heaven.
For the sake of his son, and for your peace of night, try not to eat TYPE THREE during the term of suckling, the DOS TYPE in the measures listed in the fifteenth Hypothesis, and type one of the times desired. If any while consuming more than a little concentrated carbohydrates, your child has to reproach with tears because of his intestinal cramping the next day.
If power is the way I advised: All happy!
blog index for
(- Is there anyone else that poorly nourished pregnant women?
"Yes ... two pregnant women)
MISCELLANEOUS
In this issue at the subject G
HYPOTHESIS ON THE FEEDING OF PREGNANT
Not many people are fed worse than pregnant women. It has always been the culture that has led to the terrible food to which all are subject (culture is who gives us all the wisdom, but also all the bad habits).
The archaic advice to eat "the double "because it is creating a new being, seems to be timeless, because now and for thousands of years is still" blindly. "
The major problem is that pregnant women now have in hand a number of food and drink unholy that they had a few centuries ago.
The wide variety of carbohydrate-based components available today, is changing the food in a mess. And "craving" works. That appetite bizarre that all manifest, and that medicine is called pica , always oriented, casually eating carbohydrates.
The "strawberries with whipped cream" of all stories and gags for television and film, are the perfect example.
the need to perform caesarean sections, which is increasing every year, could, in my view, be one of its consequences.
women Everything is carefully prepared to breed and bear children, as we have mentioned. The work of natural history with respect to the perpetuation of the human species has been great. But it's up to "them" when they meet this great feature ...
Since I was very young, pregnant women have shocked me, amazed me, I have filled with tenderness.
But for twenty-eight, besides all that, I'm scared.
When I started to get in touch with all the conflict in the Food, warned that pregnant women are almost always the most problematic patients.
not say how many hundreds of them have asked me asking help and advice to "in this pregnancy does not happen as in the above", where increased weight or bad (for obvious reasons, this is totally useless to talk measures and slenderness).
Of these, only fifty spend the entire pregnancy that passed by going to my office every two weeks and watch your diet as I always recommend.
You might think that something else a few hundred fifty is a very high percentage, but I must remind you that they have to go through just six or seven months, which are the only of my patients that have a date certain for completion of their "food intensive care" and that absolutely all have, exclusively, four eyes that "watch" means your obstetrician and mine. (The torque corresponding to the spouses does not count, since most of the time are the ones who provide the famous strawberries and cream. ")
Let's get a little more serious.
Many of them come to the first query very worried. In general have gone through the same situation one or more times, and have not fared well with respect to the claims of their obstetricians refer to the maximum weight recommended them (although many of them are very forgiving.)
Twelve to fifteen kilos heavier at the end of the pregnancy scare . Poor, are so used to huge increases that have come to congratulate some "because only have increased fourteen". Let
accounts based on a woman to conceive is thin. What
take a few minutes more before delivery compared to what I had at the time of conception?
- birth weight baby (Average): 3.200 kg
- Placenta (more or less): 800 gr.
- Amniotic fluid (also more or less): 1.000 kg
- Enlargement of breasts, which are prepared to feed the new baby (approx.): 1.000 kg
- Retention of water in both lower limbs by venous congestion produced by the pressure of the fetus in the inferior vena cava (similar to what we saw in the eighth hypothesis). This is because the woman is the only female of the building that runs throughout her pregnancy walking upright, causing venous stasis and consequent edema (maybe exaggerating a bit): 2.000 kg
The sum is very simple, and the result gives us eight kilos, so more than that has not of being "good thing" (let us allow nine , not to be so drastic. But no more!)
A good percentage of everything that rises above the nine kilos will go to your baby fat and , I say, what need is there to submit to a stress at the time of his birth, much bigger than it already is doomed, as discussed early, forcing him to be born with an extra pound of fat that will surely never to need.
- My son at birth weighed four hundred kilos! - Claim many mothers, with "pride."
What is the benefit they do with that amount of extra fat? Then, what is the reason for this excess of joy if all you could get to bring only problems are: to diarrhea, for example, will dehydrate more quickly than if they did.
is likely that by now you feel any guilt for having gained too much weight in their pregnancies, or being too fat right now and producing a new child.
try, where possible, to dispel that guilt is explaining why the sometimes excessive, weight gain in pregnancy.
all feel guilty about their excessive fat in that stage of their lives. Moreover, they defend their right to feel guilt. - Why such things I know I gain weight if I am aware that I not only hurt me but, worse, also my baby? I protest. But that has an explanation.
The woman is the only female of all creation who has sex while pregnant. There is no other exception in the entire animal kingdom.
Nature has given to all female special devices to prevent contact during pregnancy carnal, and males have the instinct need to shun such contact in such circumstances.
Our intelligence has been developed at the expense of canceling our ancestral instincts. But some, if only a trace of him has to stay, I guess. This, for example, in women, the avoidance of intercourse while pregnant.
But the culture tells us that pregnancy is no impediment to sex. And neither the man nor the woman see pregnancy as an obstacle to carry them out. But this "remnant of instinct", that atavism in women, completely unaware idea mechanisms to evade them.
And one of them is fat. And another diminish the quality and frequency of personal hygiene (in general, of course. There will always be exceptions). Why do you think, if not, that most women were carious teeth during pregnancy. Is it because the blood carries them to manufacture bones calcium to the fetus? No, woman, that wants the fetus has little calcium dentin, which happens to tell him combined to form insoluble compounds or even have blood vessels that could take it, having more than three kilos in the other bones and eating, for nine months, huge amounts of it.
The teeth decay because they are washed much less, despite eating many more carbs than usual, or wash with the same frequency as before, but wrong.
And bathe less often, and are arranged under (not all but most ...)
And why all this.
As for something very simple: BE SEXUALLY DESAPETECIBLES .
There must be something in the unconscious of women treated to prevent the "contacts" in times of gestation.
very much I have confessed in the privacy of the consultation, though crazy love to her husband at the time of pregnancy had for him a very special and inexplicable rejection.
You can argue that never felt a similar feeling, indeed, a few have told me that in those days increased sexual desire. But, my friend, that has occurred in his consciousness, what the heck knows what actually happened in her unconscious with the "primitive instinct to reject the relationships in times of pregnancy.
But this conflict also has a solution.
If you are pregnant or plan to become pregnant ask you read this scenario with her husband. Talk both about the subject. Share your concerns with your gynecologist or obstetrician. I am sure he will agree only to maintain relations only when you dispose it. It is for the good of all three: you, your husband and child in the womb.
My experience tells me that when the couple and I discussed this subject, Things start to take more orderly (a compulsion to eat something fattening, I mean.)
good news and also a product of the famous "Evidence."
Most pregnant women over fifty who attended the consultation time and were careful as we agreed, told me with amazement (higher in gilts that were not) that your new baby and did not need to eat every two or three hours , as is almost universal rule.
This fact, when I began to notice her often caught my attention.
I asked a friend, who by then was head of Quality Control of a milk pasteurization plant in the city, they did analyze the milk of mothers who did not eat carbohydrates and they did so freely, so what I tried the samples needed.
The results were surprising: the milk of mothers who were not consuming carbohydrates had a 22% less lactose and about 20% less fat (and, of course, a higher proportion of protein) than that " ate everything. " That makes your food to be greater, that is evacuated from the stomach of her little more slowly, and they do not gain weight as much as those of mothers who do not see any care.
For all that, the cramps disappeared so troublesome that afflict all babies, which are produced by foam forming in your intestines the similar amount of lactose containing the milk of mothers living eating carbohydrates. And this is the most attractive for all moms, after the blowjob last night - some for just a few days after birth, "sleeping" one pull "between five and seven hours, which for all was a blessing from heaven.
For the sake of his son, and for your peace of night, try not to eat TYPE THREE during the term of suckling, the DOS TYPE in the measures listed in the fifteenth Hypothesis, and type one of the times desired. If any while consuming more than a little concentrated carbohydrates, your child has to reproach with tears because of his intestinal cramping the next day.
If power is the way I advised: All happy!
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
Sinus Infection From Heater
Delivery
blog General Index
("But I'm wrong cave, and no more than a little copper and glass that I take for gold and diamonds ". Renè Descartes )
Miscellaneous
develop
In this issue F item
OPINION ON FOOD AND DRINK "DIET", "LIGHT", "low calorie" or "DIET"
Since consumer demand for food had "not fattening" a myriad of companies around the world, set themselves the task of developing lucrative food and beverage vested in the names given in the title of these paragraphs.
knew that the market was huge and basically very lucrative .
We have calculated, with a patient advocate (and do not think we're very wrong), that about fat-obesity move in the world something like two hundred fifty billion dollars a year (this calculation was made in 1999, as the surgeries are not included.)
Obviously everyone wants to raise some of this fabulous fortune.
The "Dietary Products Companies" would not be out of "business" of course.
For decades, food and beverage outlets "low calorie" in order to be consumed by those who are weight loss plan, or those who, frightened by her weight, they decide not to aggravate it.
Millions of tons of them have been consumed in base the attractive advertisements that recommended them. The
of milk, yogurt and cottage cheese, is a striking example.
Cleverly, advertisers show, for example, the sculpted bodies of girls who use their "famous Light Yogurt." The meta-message is: "If you eat may acquire these graceful figure of teen models.
is why the vast majority are acquired.
But again (and they're talking about a .....) fallacy.
Evidence tells me there are only four types of products that actually meet the precept of "no fat", or hinder the process of weight loss:
- Artificial sweeteners not powder.
- Gums "Diet", "Light" or "Free".
- The no-carb gelatin and
- The multinational soft drink nut warmly Cola, Lemon-Lime or, as explained in the fifteenth Hypothesis.
Everything else is not true. Puddings, desserts, fruit-flavored sodas, to noodles, pizzas and pastries, I've seen sell under the name that credits its position "antiengordantes." I
angry with that attitude of the manufacturers, but what can one do?
Alguna vez a algún empresario muy astuto se le ocurrió anotar en las etiquetas de los aceites que fabricaba, el rótulo “SIN COLESTEROL”, por lo que todo el mundo comenzó a consumirlos en detrimento de las otras marcas. Sus competidores se vieron, entonces, en la obligación de incinerar millones de etiquetas ya impresas, para elaborar otras que también dijeran lo mismo. Pero ocurre que los aceites vegetales no pueden contener colesterol , ya que este es un producto de exclusivo origen animal.
Ante la pregunta del por qué de esa actitud ellos responderían con otra:
–¿Los aceites vegetales tienen colesterol?
–¡No!
"So, what is sin if I explicit on their labels?
course "there is no sin." Say, eg, a mineral water brand "does not contain glucose, is true, but it suggests the need to consume the other if they could get to have it, so you must drink, preferably, stating that their absence. But that's not ethical! Old and trite
this topic of "Marketing."
foods and beverages "low calorie" are not, the vast majority, or slimming or antiengordantes. Are just a gimmick for you to purchase. These comments could
bring me problems, they said my wife and my children when they read the draft, but was convinced that what I want (another of my utopia) is that there are companies starting to develop elements "Without absorbable carbohydrates for humans , and this is true . It would be a great business
Please: Those who sell mineral water and sodas, refrain.
special precautions should be taken with bread products that are labeled "bran" or "gluten (gluten is the protein found in wheat, oats, barley and rye, and who have celiac BAN). These products are not ... but WITH ... Can not be baked or bran or gluten if it is incorporated starch. In fact nothing can be "baked" without starch. Then all you baked it contains.
And very careful with foods whose labels say "sugar." For those who do sciences (physicians, veterinarians, biochemists, pharmacists ...), word "sugar" is synonymous carbohydrate (as "carb" or "carb"), for other people, is "the product of the sugar cane or sugar beets." Then, slyly, candy or manufacturers, and many drinks they called "diet", recorded on their cigarette packs and labels "without sugar" , and it certainly does not contain "sucrose" (the name of sugar that is commonly used in every house in the world) but other types of carbohydrates (sugars) are absorbed in the intestine as glucose, as he himself as sugar cane.
Next delivery: "Hypothesis on the feeding of pregnant women."
blog General Index
("But I'm wrong cave, and no more than a little copper and glass that I take for gold and diamonds ". Renè Descartes )
Miscellaneous
develop
In this issue F item
OPINION ON FOOD AND DRINK "DIET", "LIGHT", "low calorie" or "DIET"
Since consumer demand for food had "not fattening" a myriad of companies around the world, set themselves the task of developing lucrative food and beverage vested in the names given in the title of these paragraphs.
knew that the market was huge and basically very lucrative .
We have calculated, with a patient advocate (and do not think we're very wrong), that about fat-obesity move in the world something like two hundred fifty billion dollars a year (this calculation was made in 1999, as the surgeries are not included.)
Obviously everyone wants to raise some of this fabulous fortune.
The "Dietary Products Companies" would not be out of "business" of course.
For decades, food and beverage outlets "low calorie" in order to be consumed by those who are weight loss plan, or those who, frightened by her weight, they decide not to aggravate it.
Millions of tons of them have been consumed in base the attractive advertisements that recommended them. The
of milk, yogurt and cottage cheese, is a striking example.
Cleverly, advertisers show, for example, the sculpted bodies of girls who use their "famous Light Yogurt." The meta-message is: "If you eat may acquire these graceful figure of teen models.
is why the vast majority are acquired.
But again (and they're talking about a .....) fallacy.
Evidence tells me there are only four types of products that actually meet the precept of "no fat", or hinder the process of weight loss:
- Artificial sweeteners not powder.
- Gums "Diet", "Light" or "Free".
- The no-carb gelatin and
- The multinational soft drink nut warmly Cola, Lemon-Lime or, as explained in the fifteenth Hypothesis.
Everything else is not true. Puddings, desserts, fruit-flavored sodas, to noodles, pizzas and pastries, I've seen sell under the name that credits its position "antiengordantes." I
angry with that attitude of the manufacturers, but what can one do?
Alguna vez a algún empresario muy astuto se le ocurrió anotar en las etiquetas de los aceites que fabricaba, el rótulo “SIN COLESTEROL”, por lo que todo el mundo comenzó a consumirlos en detrimento de las otras marcas. Sus competidores se vieron, entonces, en la obligación de incinerar millones de etiquetas ya impresas, para elaborar otras que también dijeran lo mismo. Pero ocurre que los aceites vegetales no pueden contener colesterol , ya que este es un producto de exclusivo origen animal.
Ante la pregunta del por qué de esa actitud ellos responderían con otra:
–¿Los aceites vegetales tienen colesterol?
–¡No!
"So, what is sin if I explicit on their labels?
course "there is no sin." Say, eg, a mineral water brand "does not contain glucose, is true, but it suggests the need to consume the other if they could get to have it, so you must drink, preferably, stating that their absence. But that's not ethical! Old and trite
this topic of "Marketing."
foods and beverages "low calorie" are not, the vast majority, or slimming or antiengordantes. Are just a gimmick for you to purchase. These comments could
bring me problems, they said my wife and my children when they read the draft, but was convinced that what I want (another of my utopia) is that there are companies starting to develop elements "Without absorbable carbohydrates for humans , and this is true . It would be a great business
Please: Those who sell mineral water and sodas, refrain.
special precautions should be taken with bread products that are labeled "bran" or "gluten (gluten is the protein found in wheat, oats, barley and rye, and who have celiac BAN). These products are not ... but WITH ... Can not be baked or bran or gluten if it is incorporated starch. In fact nothing can be "baked" without starch. Then all you baked it contains.
And very careful with foods whose labels say "sugar." For those who do sciences (physicians, veterinarians, biochemists, pharmacists ...), word "sugar" is synonymous carbohydrate (as "carb" or "carb"), for other people, is "the product of the sugar cane or sugar beets." Then, slyly, candy or manufacturers, and many drinks they called "diet", recorded on their cigarette packs and labels "without sugar" , and it certainly does not contain "sucrose" (the name of sugar that is commonly used in every house in the world) but other types of carbohydrates (sugars) are absorbed in the intestine as glucose, as he himself as sugar cane.
Next delivery: "Hypothesis on the feeding of pregnant women."
Saturday, December 9, 2006
Mobility Radeon 9000 1680 1050
twenty-two
index for blog (where you will observe that culture can often more than the logic and reasoning)
MISCELLANEOUS
In this issue at the subject E
the perennial problem of BREAKFAST
A good percentage of people consume only one type of infusion as simple as a "breakfast", but most of the first intake makes the day a "meal ".
The problem is that the habit of composition has been inherited by us in English and Italian, of which most of us are descendants. They used in their land (and other Europeans as well), to consume in the early hours of the morning, huge cups of coffee or tea with milk, accompanied by slices of fresh bread or toast spread with jam or fruit jams. (Without knowing, almost instinctively, rapid digestion carbohydrates consumed that served to launch his entire body, the short-chain sugars, and other slowly digested starches, which are long chain sugars, which gave them energy for the rest of the morning activities.)
Over the years the bread was partly replaced by cookies that support for sweets, or, lately, bakery bills (half moons are the most common).
Moral: A traditional breakfast consists mainly of carbohydrates.
Carbohydrates, which are almost the only component, is absorbed as glucose in our intestines, so they enter the blood very quickly, especially short chain or disaccharides. This makes the level of "blood glucose (glucose in the blood) to rise rapidly after the first meal.
If a fasting person has a number, eg, 0.80 grams per liter (normal is to have between 0.70 and 1.10 in those conditions), within an hour after breakfast, rises, say, to 1.20 gr. / l, so that the pancreas, which among other things analyzes the blood glucose level every second, to secrete enough insulin so that the excess of 0.40 that has occurred in such a short time, disappear from the blood and enter the cell metabolism of all the economy.
Now it happens that the amount of insulin increta the pancreas is not exact microgram those extra post-breakfast glucose, so that when the level she has returned to 0.80 gr. / L, even there is circulating insulin blood, and this level was identical to the fasting, is now down by the action of insulin residual, so that two or three hours after the first intake is as low to produce a uneasy feeling of discomfort, hopelessness and hunger that force almost all to the usual "mid-morning meal (the 'second breakfast', as it is commonly called). It is about 10:00 or 10:30 pm. when in all workplaces, or at home, the activity stops for about fifteen minutes to the famous mid-morning snack ('snack' is a word that through a complex etymological derivations gimmick, means "get your strength"), refreshment as well as Breakfast consists almost entirely of carbohydrates.
The cycle starts again, then, and the second hunger occurs at noon, but as usual that all those hours we are hungry, not surprising. Generally
noon
also consumed a good proportion of carbohydrates, so from it restarts a cycle similar to the first in the morning. The level of blood glucose decreases occur more slowly this time, as carbohydrates that are part of the lunches are generally starches (slower absorption, because they are longer chain sugars-). That is the reason that calls for the "snack" just four to five hours after lunch.
After it, again the same sequence: hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and she had hypoglycemia will occur around dinnertime.
After the evening meal is also set up the required mechanism, but one is asleep does not notice (they do many who for whatever reason they wake up in the early morning: go to the bathroom to empty your bladder, such But before returning to the bedroom feel compelled to make a "short visit to the fridge "). Almost
there is no human activity that can use that amount of carbs that most people consume, in total, with breakfast, mid morning, lunch, snack and dinner, so as we have seen, the liver changes excess fat is deposited in adipose tissue, increasing the thickness increasing, or cholesterol and triglycerides. (Which forces many to read blogs like this one).
When my patients start to take care of eliminating sugars and flours of your daily intake, are almost all with formidable conflict all morning: breakfast. The question almost universal
is, then, what and at that time?
At first, a radical change of habits, I must admit, is very annoying and almost unbearable for many, as the recommendation to a person of, say, forty-five years since the last forty-three begins your daily diet as I commented above, "to eat now, first thing, an infusion of coffee. mate tea with cream instead of milk (the latter is generally well accepted), and sweetened with artificial sweeteners, along with sliced \u200b\u200bcheese and ham (it would be an option), is literally counter.
But as the days go notice something encouraging to notice it-all, " stop feeling hungry mid-morning . Logically, no longer produces insulin hypersecretion, so that will not fall over at that hour of glucose levels, which was what aroused the feeling that sometimes came to be very upset if the type of activities developed does not allow all the times that habitual consumption of snacks (she happens to bank tellers, for example, or many of those who carry out their work in response to the public or traveling from one point to another of its geography.) Even
arrival lunch or dinner, noticed with amazement most of the time, they feel satisfied with much less than previously needed to achieve it.
"Now as far less," tell me all. To which I reply: "Before
eat much more than what was necessary, which is not the same.
Some of my patients, copying customs which show the media, have incorporated the egg breakfast. It is usually eaten scrambled and served with slices of cheese and ham, or as homelet with sliced \u200b\u200bapples, sweetened artificially with a "touch" of vanilla essence, what they mean the extra advantage of being able to bear lunch time very late. All who are struggling to usual hours for lunch I have no longer feel tortured by hunger if you must eat a lot after 13:00 or 14:00 pm.
NOTE THAT COMES TO CASE
There must be, at least in the western part, any food that has such bad press as the egg.
As chemists, many years ago, warned that contains a large amount of cholesterol (about 180 milligrams per unit), since it was discovered that cholesterol is the main element of the fearsome former atherosclerotic plaques in the inner walls of arteries, practically it aims to exclude from the human diet. If you pay attention to science communicators, notice that he speaks almost worse than cigarette or alcohol. Make the experience of taking a number of general-interest magazines, and if it is how much space is devoted to preaching against the egg, and much maligned to snuff or drink alcoholic beverages, see that I have reason.
food's actually a beautiful, almost magical. The amount of essential nutrients that owns a dozen of them (I mean the chicken, which are universally applicable) is roughly equivalent to that contained a kilogram of beef loin meat, and also a dozen eggs cost eighty percent less than a kg. loin.
is true that are high in cholesterol, but humans, to be strict herbivores , remember, we can not absorb it. Come on, we can not increase blood cholesterol by eating foods containing it, even in large numbers as in the case of the egg (as we have discussed).
cholesterol circulating in our blood, and that of all other animals that also belong to the group of herbivores, elaborate what we from carbohydrates that are found primarily in the organic matter of vegetable origin. (WARNING: back to say that one should care primarily from plant foods that contain a large amount per unit of measurement: grain, flour and sugar, which contain relatively many starches and sugars in their long chain structure, such as potatoes, sweet potatoes, pumpkins, squash, beets and fruits. The products of animal origin which are much less must be careful honey, milk, young cheeses and yogurt.)
There is, to my knowledge, no study in humans that can ensure, with unquestionable certainty, that eating large numbers of eggs do raise cholesterol levels in our blood (Indeed, on 10 0ctober 2003, the World Health Organization has desincriminado). In fact, my patients that they are not prohibited and consume freely, never cholesterol He raised it (basing always in biochemical laboratory tests using reagents with high sensitivity and reliability). Quite the contrary, to leave the abusive use of carbohydrates, the figures were down, sometimes in ways that to them and I would not believe.
The error of these statements comes, as we have discussed, to use as animal research models called "omnivores like us," but actually are not strict carnivores , such as rats and mice.
As a geriatrician, that bad publicity is so great food makes me believe glaring problems. The elderly, due to a reduction in intestinal absorption of protein is normal for his age, and to be more pronounced over the years should eat more of them than young people (unless the particular disease inadvisable, which, thank God is very rare).
As usual source of major prótidos are meat, having holes in your teeth, gradually excluding the range of their diet, so that the egg becomes an important source for them, fundamental protein.
But when you tell them they should consume at least half a dozen daily, feel, and you can tell, as if they were prescribing a poison infallible. It is so long and so what they hear bad eggs that some even think that eating just one, would end his life long before the end of the digestion of it.
IS NO EVIDENCE THAT SAYS consuming EGG CHOLESTEROL INCREASES THE BLOOD, AND AS A RESULT, THE POSSIBILITY atherosclerosis. I say that only laboratory tests done on animals that are genetically very distant from us like ants to elephants.
But: "The dogma says that ... And the dogma is our guide, our compass ...!-
Until when?
Next delivery : Comments about food and drink "diet", "Light", "low calorie" or "diet."
Wednesday, December 6, 2006
In Poptropica Why Do All My Stats Say 1 Out Of 20
twenty-one
blog index for
(where it will continue to monitor that the etymology is still a problem)
MISCELLANEOUS
DEVELOP IN THIS ISSUE ITEM D
hypotheses about VIEWS RELATING TO THE "Bulimia"
This term was first used around 1884, and was taken from the Greek id. Bulimia composed of bous 'ox' and limos 'hunger'. literally means "hungry exaggerated" (hence the figure "ox hunger"), and his doctor is synonymous with 'polyphagous'. But the use in recent decades has been that only serves to define harass people with any type of food and then take extreme attitudes by claiming that what they have eaten not fattening: vomiting after eating and / or consuming doses of laxatives and diuretics abuse.
To complicate matters further, in recent years has created a so-called "third state". A mixture of "anorexia" and "bulimia", which has been called "bulianorexia" or "bulinorexia" , which is what is supposed to have carriers " anorexia" , which alternate with periods of uncontrollable compulsion to eat 'anything'. I think
attacks unstoppable urge to eat "any thing in excessive quantities, which is usually seen in Afag and many of hipofágicas, is nothing more than a real defense mechanism of an organism found in the grave emergency being heavily lack of vitality nutrients (sometimes so blind that compulsion to eat, who come to eat items that are not considered by any culture as real food).
remember two cases that struck me, one that of a girl who, faint with hunger by refusing to eat for several days, found in the freezer of your refrigerator a dozen caps and ate empanadas block without even waiting that will thaw, and another that told me, reached into the jar of waste and gobbled potato peels his mother had thrown into it at noon).
is exactly equal to the uncontrollable thirst for those unfortunate circumstances that have been in the horrible situation of being several days without anything to drink, so they have gone as far as taking his own urine (for defenders of "bulimia", the unnatural act of drinking something as unusual as one's own urine would be an act of "budipsia", "sed ox ').
When you talk to so-called "bulimic" has no more to fall in conclusion that uncontrolled intake is just an excuse to induce vomiting.
I propose that these patients are called EMETOMANOS , also derived from the Greek word: emet, 'I vomit', and mania , 'madness', which in this case be interpreted as' irresistible compulsion. "
The gag makes our brain to release a substance called "endorphins" , which have similar chemical structures and actions of morphine: raise the pain threshold and produce an odd sense of being false like her.
This production of endorphins is what makes us feel so placid then an occasional vomiting (due to indigestion, for example). But that is almost as addictive as its counterpart: "morphine." The
EMETOMANOS (bulimia) is vomit because of his unconscious need to feel that pseudorreconfortante action of endorphins.
The most serious problem is that over the days become addicted neuroproductos those posts to run from the action of throwing up, why is it so hard to eliminate this habit. Putting it crudely: become addicted to the drug itself.
I have seen and known many cases hemetómanos, but I will relate one that is very exemplary.
Anecdote of office:
N. was some time ago, a woman of forty-four years. He came to me for help, desperate, because I wanted to stop vomiting.
As a teenager, a friend asked her why she cared so much in their food, so he explained that because of his fear of gaining weight. The friend then entrusted with a "tactic" using the same subject: "I eat what I want, and when I feel tired, I go and vomit what I ate.
My patient (I was fifteen at the time) recognized this attitude as "savior." Now I could swallow what he wanted, whether total, then vomited. I do not get fat without depriving themselves of nothing more ...!
At first the thing was going well, ate what he wanted and not get fat, and threw it after full.
But when they passed a few months notice, frightened, she could not stop vomiting occur (although it had eaten very little, or worse, but for some reason, a strong flu-like, for example, one day I had not eaten anything) . He was ashamed of that, so he devised a thousand stratagems to anyone discover his secret habit.
He married, had children. His teeth had shrunk because daily contact with the hydrochloric acid in gastric juice.
When her husband discovered, accidentally, their uncontrollable mania, appealed to a thousand resources, including a self-help group. But no results.
I consulted a Thursday afternoon in the spring of 1992. - I want to vomit! - Was his plea.
was not fat, not skinny (at last one throws up only half of what's in your stomach). She was thin, his eating habits were normal. Only their small teeth and sad and troubled, melancholy, it denoted a serious condition. For many years
ever consumed large quantities of anything, but his compulsion was totally uncontrollable.
- Have you been a day without throwing up in these twenty-nine years? - I asked.
- No! ... Never, not one left to do ... and ground vomit several times each day, "he said.
"I think it would be interesting to try to be twenty-four hours cause it to vomit ... If nothing else, that (I said innocently.) I want to tell me that he felt to be a day without it ... Tonight I propose that (at that time had not vomited) not overfill your stomach, after dinner take forty drops of the medicine (which was metoclopramide, a potent gastric evacuating antivomitivo), and then walk with her husband no less than an hour. Upon returning home his stomach completely empty, so you do not have nothing to expel him. The following week
attended the hospital as we had agreed.
- How did you do?! - I asked expectantly. .....-
-Mal ... "I did what I said ... When we got to walk I was exhausted and languid, so we went immediately to bed ... As soon as I noticed that my husband was asleep, I stood on tiptoe, went to the bathroom, threw up a little foam and then I slept ... I slept soundly.
End of story.
What to do with the emetómanos?, Is the inevitable question.
In my view urgently need consultation with interdisciplinary teams specializing in addictions.
But most important is to act quickly: as soon as possible after the box is detected, and discredit, in every way imaginable, the erroneous idea that the low nutrient intake is the way to prevent obesity is installed , or fight it if it is already installed.
always fall into the same thing:
Evidence has shown that low-calorie diets for carencientes are unnatural, do not work, and their practitioners immersed in the dangerous idea that eating just a little (or eliminating half of what is ingested by means of vomiting, for example) can achieved an enviable body.
Evidence has also shown that anorectic any chemical, physical, surgical, mechanical or deterrence, not works. But believe, between those who have consumed the false idea that if they can not because we do not tolerate or can not afford treatment, the vomiting could be a good replacement. And
the evidence that tells us that despite having insisted for more than a century with the same, things as they are, do not go.
That future generations will not go to that company and its predecessors.
Next delivery: "The perennial problem of breakfast
blog index for
(where it will continue to monitor that the etymology is still a problem)
MISCELLANEOUS
DEVELOP IN THIS ISSUE ITEM D
hypotheses about VIEWS RELATING TO THE "Bulimia"
This term was first used around 1884, and was taken from the Greek id. Bulimia composed of bous 'ox' and limos 'hunger'. literally means "hungry exaggerated" (hence the figure "ox hunger"), and his doctor is synonymous with 'polyphagous'. But the use in recent decades has been that only serves to define harass people with any type of food and then take extreme attitudes by claiming that what they have eaten not fattening: vomiting after eating and / or consuming doses of laxatives and diuretics abuse.
To complicate matters further, in recent years has created a so-called "third state". A mixture of "anorexia" and "bulimia", which has been called "bulianorexia" or "bulinorexia" , which is what is supposed to have carriers " anorexia" , which alternate with periods of uncontrollable compulsion to eat 'anything'. I think
attacks unstoppable urge to eat "any thing in excessive quantities, which is usually seen in Afag and many of hipofágicas, is nothing more than a real defense mechanism of an organism found in the grave emergency being heavily lack of vitality nutrients (sometimes so blind that compulsion to eat, who come to eat items that are not considered by any culture as real food).
remember two cases that struck me, one that of a girl who, faint with hunger by refusing to eat for several days, found in the freezer of your refrigerator a dozen caps and ate empanadas block without even waiting that will thaw, and another that told me, reached into the jar of waste and gobbled potato peels his mother had thrown into it at noon).
is exactly equal to the uncontrollable thirst for those unfortunate circumstances that have been in the horrible situation of being several days without anything to drink, so they have gone as far as taking his own urine (for defenders of "bulimia", the unnatural act of drinking something as unusual as one's own urine would be an act of "budipsia", "sed ox ').
When you talk to so-called "bulimic" has no more to fall in conclusion that uncontrolled intake is just an excuse to induce vomiting.
I propose that these patients are called EMETOMANOS , also derived from the Greek word: emet, 'I vomit', and mania , 'madness', which in this case be interpreted as' irresistible compulsion. "
The gag makes our brain to release a substance called "endorphins" , which have similar chemical structures and actions of morphine: raise the pain threshold and produce an odd sense of being false like her.
This production of endorphins is what makes us feel so placid then an occasional vomiting (due to indigestion, for example). But that is almost as addictive as its counterpart: "morphine." The
EMETOMANOS (bulimia) is vomit because of his unconscious need to feel that pseudorreconfortante action of endorphins.
The most serious problem is that over the days become addicted neuroproductos those posts to run from the action of throwing up, why is it so hard to eliminate this habit. Putting it crudely: become addicted to the drug itself.
I have seen and known many cases hemetómanos, but I will relate one that is very exemplary.
Anecdote of office:
N. was some time ago, a woman of forty-four years. He came to me for help, desperate, because I wanted to stop vomiting.
As a teenager, a friend asked her why she cared so much in their food, so he explained that because of his fear of gaining weight. The friend then entrusted with a "tactic" using the same subject: "I eat what I want, and when I feel tired, I go and vomit what I ate.
My patient (I was fifteen at the time) recognized this attitude as "savior." Now I could swallow what he wanted, whether total, then vomited. I do not get fat without depriving themselves of nothing more ...!
At first the thing was going well, ate what he wanted and not get fat, and threw it after full.
But when they passed a few months notice, frightened, she could not stop vomiting occur (although it had eaten very little, or worse, but for some reason, a strong flu-like, for example, one day I had not eaten anything) . He was ashamed of that, so he devised a thousand stratagems to anyone discover his secret habit.
He married, had children. His teeth had shrunk because daily contact with the hydrochloric acid in gastric juice.
When her husband discovered, accidentally, their uncontrollable mania, appealed to a thousand resources, including a self-help group. But no results.
I consulted a Thursday afternoon in the spring of 1992. - I want to vomit! - Was his plea.
was not fat, not skinny (at last one throws up only half of what's in your stomach). She was thin, his eating habits were normal. Only their small teeth and sad and troubled, melancholy, it denoted a serious condition. For many years
ever consumed large quantities of anything, but his compulsion was totally uncontrollable.
- Have you been a day without throwing up in these twenty-nine years? - I asked.
- No! ... Never, not one left to do ... and ground vomit several times each day, "he said.
"I think it would be interesting to try to be twenty-four hours cause it to vomit ... If nothing else, that (I said innocently.) I want to tell me that he felt to be a day without it ... Tonight I propose that (at that time had not vomited) not overfill your stomach, after dinner take forty drops of the medicine (which was metoclopramide, a potent gastric evacuating antivomitivo), and then walk with her husband no less than an hour. Upon returning home his stomach completely empty, so you do not have nothing to expel him. The following week
attended the hospital as we had agreed.
- How did you do?! - I asked expectantly. .....-
-Mal ... "I did what I said ... When we got to walk I was exhausted and languid, so we went immediately to bed ... As soon as I noticed that my husband was asleep, I stood on tiptoe, went to the bathroom, threw up a little foam and then I slept ... I slept soundly.
End of story.
What to do with the emetómanos?, Is the inevitable question.
In my view urgently need consultation with interdisciplinary teams specializing in addictions.
But most important is to act quickly: as soon as possible after the box is detected, and discredit, in every way imaginable, the erroneous idea that the low nutrient intake is the way to prevent obesity is installed , or fight it if it is already installed.
always fall into the same thing:
Evidence has shown that low-calorie diets for carencientes are unnatural, do not work, and their practitioners immersed in the dangerous idea that eating just a little (or eliminating half of what is ingested by means of vomiting, for example) can achieved an enviable body.
Evidence has also shown that anorectic any chemical, physical, surgical, mechanical or deterrence, not works. But believe, between those who have consumed the false idea that if they can not because we do not tolerate or can not afford treatment, the vomiting could be a good replacement. And
the evidence that tells us that despite having insisted for more than a century with the same, things as they are, do not go.
That future generations will not go to that company and its predecessors.
Next delivery: "The perennial problem of breakfast
Saturday, December 2, 2006
Do I Have Skin Cancer
Delivery Delivery Delivery nineteen twenty
(where to find that etymology has a lot to do health issues)
MISCELLANEOUS
DEVELOP IN THIS ISSUE ITEM C
HYPOTHESIS ON THE "ANOREXIA NERVOSA"
In a blog like this could not miss the views of the author, concerning a problem that has spread throughout the Western world with amazing speed .
First of all I want to let you know my opinion on the term used to call it: ANOREXIA.
I think it's wrong.
Anorexia is derived from the Greek word that literally means' lack of appetite '( an , negative prefix' no 'or `missing', and Orexia , 'hunger'), and that no is true for anything in the case that concerns us.
To differentiate it from real-anorexia very common symptom in certain pathologies, from very simple as the common and various infectious conditions, and therefore of short duration (expired viral or bacterial disease, hunger returns slowly but surely to be the same that commonly felt before infection) to severe anorexia that occurs in many terminal diseases, and accompanies its carriers until the end of her days when she is not the cause of this last, to differentiate, said, is called to the one spontaneously, without any pathological explanation, usually in young adolescents: anorexia nervosa .
When you talk to a carrier of this type of "anorexia" (I mean the female because it is where are most of the cases) is to discover, with amazement, which is not that feed because they are not hungry, but because they simply refuse to eat .
The proper term would then aphagia (speaking also of Greek origin that means letting go of swallowing. In to , prefinancing negative, phage , 'swallow', 'swallow'). These digressions may
taken, at first glance like a simple itch idiomatic of the author, but I will try to convince him not at all well.
If we talk about "aphagia" , makes us understand the reasoning for pictures of other girls who literally can not be called so, because it is not 'no eat' because they refuse to swallow, but 'eat very little ', so that the name of Afag would be improper. To these must be named HIPOFÁGICAS or oligophagous ("hypo" is the Greek prefix meaning 'deficiency', and "oligo" also means 'low' 'Poor').
such differentiation is extremely important, because therapeutic measures to take to a "Afag" or face a "hipofágica" are very different. As different as the reasons why they have come to one or another state.
is believed, innocently and as an undisputed fact that the "blame" for the "anorexia" the images are around this time show the media: women's bodies beautiful and supremely refined.
"All teenagers want to look like them," he thought. "That is the universal cause of this disorder."
But that thought is absolutely wrong, in my view.
The Afag undergo terrible hardships as a result of serious psychiatric disorders feel a pathological fear grow, and yet believe discover (worse, so reckless dissemination of the subject have taught) not eating can be left to continue growing. feel a morbid fear to become adults.
Earlier we discussed the identity crisis of adolescents. The great drama that support by having to leave behind dependent children but comfortable to go toward a responsible adult that will necessarily require self-sufficiency, which is naturally irreversible process.
A huge amount of girls and some men (women are much more abundant than males in these problems simply because they quickly notice the bodily changes that take them away from children), have discovered that "to prolong childhood " to stop eating enough . The Peter Pan in all of us apparently can fulfill his dream: "I do not grow more.
If you know someone Afag have noticed that your body is equal to that of a girl, so, so she did not even menstruating (such as real girls).
The solution to this problem is terribly complex.
So far the results obtained with the almost torturous methods of self-help groups have been less frustrating than psychiatric treatment, and these slightly less disappointing that psychological therapies.
Despite all this help, the sufferer of aphagia arrive in large numbers, unfortunately, death by starvation.
The hiccups oligophagous or have a disorder with many best expectations. They simply want to look "to fashion a body." Have taught them otherwise than to highlight the natural teenage rebellion: do not eat to look like the skeletal models they see in magazines and on television.
Thankfully, some countries such as England and Spain, for example, have already legislated to curb the display of models with bodies so meager. It would be great if that attitude is universal.
If I were legislator would propose that every time you see the image of a model wearing any clothes, put your foot her age. Is commonly the make-up girls, including some that have not yet been developed, to have the look of young ladies of twenty to twenty five years. What you get is that adolescents in this age want to wear the body which are on the runways (-If they are my age, "believe," why I can not have a body like that of them-). But because of sexual fat they have developed what can be achieved only if both its food shortages and to reduce muscle mass, and then the fat female sex.
The solution to this problem is quite simple, in my opinion. A strong and vigorous attitude of parents or their caregivers to a problem that does not happen to be, with apologies to psychologists and psychiatrists for the simplicity of my arguments, rather than an angry teenage fad, could be solved in a short time .
course, the beginning is very difficult to differentiate a hipofágica a legitimate Afag , but fortunately, there is enough time to distinguish one from another.
If placing strict limits, such as prohibiting youth develop their activities if they turn eat properly, do not get anything, or worse, the picture worsens, being in the presence of Afag , so that attitudes to taken must be more drastic, severe and urgent: to lead a support group, for example.
I have known for many hipofágicas that changed his attitude to the strong attitude of their parents: - Do not want to eat?, Okay ... But you will not get this house until you do.
Almost invariably in these cases, after two or three days of faculty, the situation began to reverse. In somewhat more complex cases, after a brief psychological therapy solved the problem started.
also, unfortunately, I've heard from others in that no matter the time of confinement and deprivation, their attitude is unshakable. It is as if they had decided to commit suicide by starvation. This is where you have to take heroic attitudes.
typify the problem and hipofágicas Afag under the common denominator of Anorexic is that these attitudes are determined for some than for others, and as the vast majority are nothing but teenage rebel group the hipofágicas , they are subject, in excess, to the torturous but necessary treatments should be given to other Afag in order to save their lives.
I have heard and read many times that about twenty percent of anorexics die of their problem (these percentages were higher a few years ago and are declining as time goes on, thank goodness) . I am convinced that all who die are Afag, and the survivors are in their vast majority hipofágicas.
is by this that I consider it appropriate to change nouns that call.
If we change the way we express ourselves, forcibly change our therapeutic attitude (and I am convinced that change for the better ).
Next delivery: "HYPOTHESIS ON THE VIEWS RELATING TO THE BULIMIA"
(where to find that etymology has a lot to do health issues)
MISCELLANEOUS
DEVELOP IN THIS ISSUE ITEM C
HYPOTHESIS ON THE "ANOREXIA NERVOSA"
In a blog like this could not miss the views of the author, concerning a problem that has spread throughout the Western world with amazing speed .
First of all I want to let you know my opinion on the term used to call it: ANOREXIA.
I think it's wrong.
Anorexia is derived from the Greek word that literally means' lack of appetite '( an , negative prefix' no 'or `missing', and Orexia , 'hunger'), and that no is true for anything in the case that concerns us.
To differentiate it from real-anorexia very common symptom in certain pathologies, from very simple as the common and various infectious conditions, and therefore of short duration (expired viral or bacterial disease, hunger returns slowly but surely to be the same that commonly felt before infection) to severe anorexia that occurs in many terminal diseases, and accompanies its carriers until the end of her days when she is not the cause of this last, to differentiate, said, is called to the one spontaneously, without any pathological explanation, usually in young adolescents: anorexia nervosa .
When you talk to a carrier of this type of "anorexia" (I mean the female because it is where are most of the cases) is to discover, with amazement, which is not that feed because they are not hungry, but because they simply refuse to eat .
The proper term would then aphagia (speaking also of Greek origin that means letting go of swallowing. In to , prefinancing negative, phage , 'swallow', 'swallow'). These digressions may
taken, at first glance like a simple itch idiomatic of the author, but I will try to convince him not at all well.
If we talk about "aphagia" , makes us understand the reasoning for pictures of other girls who literally can not be called so, because it is not 'no eat' because they refuse to swallow, but 'eat very little ', so that the name of Afag would be improper. To these must be named HIPOFÁGICAS or oligophagous ("hypo" is the Greek prefix meaning 'deficiency', and "oligo" also means 'low' 'Poor').
such differentiation is extremely important, because therapeutic measures to take to a "Afag" or face a "hipofágica" are very different. As different as the reasons why they have come to one or another state.
is believed, innocently and as an undisputed fact that the "blame" for the "anorexia" the images are around this time show the media: women's bodies beautiful and supremely refined.
"All teenagers want to look like them," he thought. "That is the universal cause of this disorder."
But that thought is absolutely wrong, in my view.
The Afag undergo terrible hardships as a result of serious psychiatric disorders feel a pathological fear grow, and yet believe discover (worse, so reckless dissemination of the subject have taught) not eating can be left to continue growing. feel a morbid fear to become adults.
Earlier we discussed the identity crisis of adolescents. The great drama that support by having to leave behind dependent children but comfortable to go toward a responsible adult that will necessarily require self-sufficiency, which is naturally irreversible process.
A huge amount of girls and some men (women are much more abundant than males in these problems simply because they quickly notice the bodily changes that take them away from children), have discovered that "to prolong childhood " to stop eating enough . The Peter Pan in all of us apparently can fulfill his dream: "I do not grow more.
If you know someone Afag have noticed that your body is equal to that of a girl, so, so she did not even menstruating (such as real girls).
The solution to this problem is terribly complex.
So far the results obtained with the almost torturous methods of self-help groups have been less frustrating than psychiatric treatment, and these slightly less disappointing that psychological therapies.
Despite all this help, the sufferer of aphagia arrive in large numbers, unfortunately, death by starvation.
The hiccups oligophagous or have a disorder with many best expectations. They simply want to look "to fashion a body." Have taught them otherwise than to highlight the natural teenage rebellion: do not eat to look like the skeletal models they see in magazines and on television.
Thankfully, some countries such as England and Spain, for example, have already legislated to curb the display of models with bodies so meager. It would be great if that attitude is universal.
If I were legislator would propose that every time you see the image of a model wearing any clothes, put your foot her age. Is commonly the make-up girls, including some that have not yet been developed, to have the look of young ladies of twenty to twenty five years. What you get is that adolescents in this age want to wear the body which are on the runways (-If they are my age, "believe," why I can not have a body like that of them-). But because of sexual fat they have developed what can be achieved only if both its food shortages and to reduce muscle mass, and then the fat female sex.
The solution to this problem is quite simple, in my opinion. A strong and vigorous attitude of parents or their caregivers to a problem that does not happen to be, with apologies to psychologists and psychiatrists for the simplicity of my arguments, rather than an angry teenage fad, could be solved in a short time .
course, the beginning is very difficult to differentiate a hipofágica a legitimate Afag , but fortunately, there is enough time to distinguish one from another.
If placing strict limits, such as prohibiting youth develop their activities if they turn eat properly, do not get anything, or worse, the picture worsens, being in the presence of Afag , so that attitudes to taken must be more drastic, severe and urgent: to lead a support group, for example.
I have known for many hipofágicas that changed his attitude to the strong attitude of their parents: - Do not want to eat?, Okay ... But you will not get this house until you do.
Almost invariably in these cases, after two or three days of faculty, the situation began to reverse. In somewhat more complex cases, after a brief psychological therapy solved the problem started.
also, unfortunately, I've heard from others in that no matter the time of confinement and deprivation, their attitude is unshakable. It is as if they had decided to commit suicide by starvation. This is where you have to take heroic attitudes.
typify the problem and hipofágicas Afag under the common denominator of Anorexic is that these attitudes are determined for some than for others, and as the vast majority are nothing but teenage rebel group the hipofágicas , they are subject, in excess, to the torturous but necessary treatments should be given to other Afag in order to save their lives.
I have heard and read many times that about twenty percent of anorexics die of their problem (these percentages were higher a few years ago and are declining as time goes on, thank goodness) . I am convinced that all who die are Afag, and the survivors are in their vast majority hipofágicas.
is by this that I consider it appropriate to change nouns that call.
If we change the way we express ourselves, forcibly change our therapeutic attitude (and I am convinced that change for the better ).
Next delivery: "HYPOTHESIS ON THE VIEWS RELATING TO THE BULIMIA"
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)