Cq50-105nr Wireless Driver

(where it will again demonstrate that our culture is full of lies. Short text, but will very interesting and educational)

MISCELLANEOUS

IN THIS ISSUE Develop the topic B

HYPOTHESIS ON THE FOOD OF WINTER AND SUMMER.

We are all convinced that we live in the southern hemisphere eat backwards. We believe that as our culture comes from the north, our modes of feeding are disrupted.
- Eat nuts, almonds and nougat nuts at Christmas?, That is nonsense! - We all, because it is a custom imported into the southern lands by immigrants from the north.
We are convinced that consuming these foods in midsummer holiday is a stupid atavism imposed by our ancestors, because they grew up with the usual are eaten in the winters of year-end from their places of origin.
For something similar, in all places where it is cold, its people, or those who pass by them, believe that eating chocolate bars is a way to protect yourself from the harsh seasonal. One always remembers
film images of U.S. soldiers fighting over a candy bar from the rich to supposedly make more bearable the harsh European winter war. (Actually what they needed was to feel sweet taste in their palates, as we have seen, to pretend to feel protected from the aggression that they played live.)
is why, we are confident , we are victims of a sort of collective psychosis, a counterculture force us to eat nuts and chocolate in the hot South American summer.
remember as an event comedy, which I read as a child in the children's magazine Billiken that "gives more heat in winter an ice cream than a bowl of soup", since the note said, "has more calories ice cream chocolate than a bowl of soup. "
And I believed him. But, above all, I loved the story because no one can deny that when you're a child is a thousand times richer ice cream a good portion of a soup (but then very cold).

But none of that is true.

We said earlier that for all, the mouth is not more than the mouth of a furnace in which the more fuel it adds more heat is produced, and this is a fallacy.
It seems we have forgotten something essential: INTRINSIC HEAT OF SUBSTANCES , a concept that in our Faculty of Medicine of Rosario Julio showed us in his famous lecture Barman Biological Physics.
Every element, apart from dozens of physical properties that characterize it, has a very particular, about which very little is said: INTRINSIC HEAT.
Named to the ability of any member, to retain for more or less heat that has provided a source of it. If we heat a hundred degrees centigrade one liter of water and an oil, and then, in unison, remove from the heat, we see that the water takes much longer to cool. Consequently, water has more intrinsic heat the oil. In fact, as I recall, is distilled water the hottest intrinsic element of all that exist.
The man, after discovering the fire, noted that hot water is pure emetic, but if it is dissolved in an element that gives flavor automatically ceases to be enjoyable. And also noted that by eating a hot water flavored compound, are more easily defended from the cold environment in their forced exposure to it. The teas, broths and stews are the result of that observation.
and rigorous way. By ingesting food or drink that has a high intrinsic heat (lots of hot water in its composition) our temperature rise a few tenths of a degree-elevation to be maintained for a long time-which will more easily withstand prolonged exposure prevailing cold. For those Russians consume large quantities of tea almost boiling (taken from their traditional samovar) before exposure to the frigid temperatures of their crudelísimos winters.
In our Christmas, ending with the matter, consume, in fact, elements of very low intrinsic heat roasts of beef or pork, or chicken or turkey, and salads of all kinds, for example. And drink things that have a high percentage of cold water, because as the water is the ultimate in cool, is also what takes longer to warm up, so it keeps the cold longer than it has been submitted.
At Christmas in the northern hemisphere, where temperatures are very low at these times, food and beverages are consumed with high intrinsic heat soups, stews ... That is the real difference.

Next delivery: Hypothesis on the "anorexia nervosa".

Does Orajel Tooth Desensitizer Work?

Index published to date eighteen

For those just entering the blog will not have difficulty reading it from beginning to end and for the older readers quickly find the hypothesis that want to reread, here is a already published index (to be updated in each installment).

chapters Index BLOG

1 - Today begins a new view things. Preface and Introduction.

2 - First Hypothesis: OLD TERMS NEW
DEFINICIONESPARA
3 - Scenario II: THE FAT IS NOT A DISEASE

4 - Third Hypothesis: the physiological process DESCRIPTION OF FAT

5 - Annex to the third hypothesis and Fourth Hypothesis: the physiological process DESCRIPTION OF SLIMMING

6 - Fifth Hypothesis: We must not confuse WEIGHT LOSS WITH weakens

7 - Sixth Hypothesis: CONFLICT eclipsing

8 - Seventh Hypothesis: ORDER BY TERROR

9 - Eighth Hypothesis: THE FAT NOT PRODUCE ANY DISEASES THAT YOU BLAME

10 - Novena Hypothesis: THE FAT IN CHILDREN

11 - Tenth Hypothesis: THE FAT IN ADOLESCENCE

12 - Eleventh Hypothesis: THE "PATIENT PROBLEM"

13 - Twelfth Hypothesis: the harmful anorectic

14 - Thirteenth Hypothesis: THE FORCE WILL

15 - Fourteenth Hypothesis: the feminine silhouette

16 - Fifteenth Hypothesis: MY PROPOSAL

17 - Sixteenth Hypothesis: PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN THE PROCESS Weight Loss

18 - Miscellaneous: A) THEORY ON WHY WE FEEL THE NEED TO EAT SWEET THINGS WRONG WHEN WE
VA
19 - Miscellaneous: B) HYPOTHESIS ON THE FOOD OF WINTER AND SUMMER

20 - Miscellaneous: C) HYPOTHESIS ON THE "ANOREXIA NERVOSA"

21 - Miscellaneous: D) hypotheses about VIEWS RELATING TO THE "Bulimia"

22 - Miscellaneous: E) THE ETERNAL PROBLEM OF BREAKFAST

23 - Miscellaneous: F) OPINION ON FOOD AND DRINK "DIET", "LIGHT", "low calorie" or "DIET"

24 - Miscellaneous: G) FOOD HYPOTHESIS OF PREGNANT

25 - Dedications and Epilogue

26 - HOW TO CHOOSE A GOOD METHOD FOR WEIGHT LOSS

27 - MYTHS IN MEDICINE: THE DRY HEAT IS GOOD FOR RHEUMATISM, MOIST HEAT IS BAD "

28 - MYTHS IN MEDICINE: HOW TO TAKE THE TIME-inflammatory, analgesic and fever? "

29 - MYTHS IN MEDICINE: THE ATTACK OF LIVER"

30 - MEDICAL MYTHS "TAKE THAT TIME OR ANTIGASTRÍTICOS ANTIULCER"

31 - MYTHS IN MEDICINE: "Da HYPERTENSION SYMPTOMS? WHAT? "(Part One)

32 - MYTHS IN MEDICINE:" Da HYPERTENSION SYMPTOMS? WHAT? "(Part II)

33 - MYTHS IN MEDICINE:" Can you eat green leafy vegetables and seed-containing foods very small when you have diverticula in the large intestine? "

34 - LATE DELIVERY "thinners"

Audio Drivers Gateway P-7811fx

(in "Poor Fat ...!" first arose the problem to address some important issues could not place in any chapter of the book. It occurred to me then write one under the heading of miscellaneous. That was the way scoring concepts, for me very important, which have no relationship.
As now I am in the same situation, I will use the same resource to set out some hypotheses that have had their special place in any place of the above and that its brevity does not warrant being listed individually. (This time I got results)


MISCELLANEOUS

The brief index of what I will try in every delivery is as follows:

A) Hypothesis on why we feel the need to eat sweets when we goes wrong.

B) Hypothesis sobe meals of winter and summer.

C) Hypothesis on "Anorexia Nervosa."

D) Hypothesis on "Bulimia."

E) The perennial problem of breakfast.

F) Opinion on the food and drink "Diet", "Light", "Low calorie" or directly, "Dietary".

G) Hypothesis on the correct method of feeding for pregnant women.


IN THIS ISSUE Develop the topic A


HYPOTHESIS ON WHY WE FEEL THE NEED TO EAT SWEET THINGS WRONG WHEN WE VA.

It is really unusual for fat, and that we are not also feel the irrepressible appetite for eating sweet things, or that contain starches, in response to each aggression So gives us life.
This attitude, at first glance abnormal and pathological, it is quite normal and logical in all mammals (which naturally includes humans).

The first months of life were spent in comfort in our mother's womb.
There, in that stronghold almost magic, enjoy the period of greater security of our entire existence.
In total darkness, with no noise to disturb us, no one touch us (We are immersed in a sea of \u200b\u200bamniotic fluid), provided the ideal and constant temperature of 37 º C, without the need to breathe, sweating and shivering, drinking or eating (or that of work to get food or drink). What more placid state can come to experiencing the rest of our existence?
But, as always, everything good is finished. At some point it's all over ..... Out!, Is the order of nature: To live life in this world toiled, that's what one is born!
And how do we get the extrauterine world? As with the first thing you have on hand: with AGGRESSION.

light delivery room blinds us, and noise environment deafen us. We hit a slap on the buttocks, with which we are forced to feel the pain of implementing our mechanism to breathe, until our own tears stuns us. The temperature is suddenly ten to fifteen degrees centigrade lower than that of the mother's warm belly. We scraped all over with a gauze pad to remove the remnants of what until a few minutes we had protected. And we are pulling back and forth, they put a tube in his nose aspirator to suck the mucus poor is on them to provide us with the excuse of breath and "do our arrival in the new world that is less traumatic." We put in eye drops that burn more antiseptic than vinegar. And as if all this were not enough, we have to endure the screams of an ironic obstetrician who yells WELCOME!

But soon all the torture is over. Calm returns

and silence, the blinding light disappears; again the warmth of the mother's body. And there, for the first time since our "debut", something nice and pleasant: the sweet taste of warm milk in our mouth .
gratifying is the first impression we receive. And it's not just rich, it seems that also served to take away all the pain, because when we cry There goes!: The teat in the mouth. No matter the cause of crying, always fresh splash of milk calms.
And it becomes a conditioned reflex . Reflex that is seared into our unconscious sweet milk = bad experience as a reward and comfort.
And so every day. When later

gums hurt us because our teeth "want to cut," coco bread to bite, something durito to "help them to cut" our saliva transform starch into sugar candy.
And before the bump, the result of our fledgling effort to learn to walk, a candy lollipop to abate the penalty. Like when our first tummy ache and pain, caused by foam that forms in the intestines the enormous amount of lactose that contains the rich milk of the breast (due to overconsumption of food that mom does with lots of carbs with the excuse that "breastfeeding") because of being unable to produce sufficient amount of "lactase (enzyme that breaks down lactose into its two component molecules: glucose and galactose, so they can be absorbed by the walls of our small intestines) to digest in its entirety, which requires that we provide the sweet, vanilla antiflatulent. So

grow: to every bad thing, sweet to offset or alleviate.

So How else to react as intended, as adults, whether from birth we are "taught" that everything can be solved with something sweet? If our unconscious knows no more effective.

So the compulsion of all before the anguish, pain, despair, anxiety or uncertainty.
If even the other mammals same thing happens. Give your dog a candy as nervous and you'll notice it as quiet (do not do this often on the grounds that I have recommended it. The veterinarian who treats you be mad at me).
Look at the attitude of the trainers in the circus, when after forcing horses or bears, example, do stunts, we present them lumps of sugar to make them for calm. The horses, bears and other mammals are marked with the first sweet taste impression protective mother's milk after birth trauma aggressive.

If what you read reasonably must think that the problem has no solution, right?, But do not be alarmed, does have one .

not try to fight this compulsion to abstinence as primitive.
What we need is real and unconsciously feel "like candy" to the bad times of life. But you should know that no matter the quality of we need to bring fresh element to the mouth.
Our culture makes when we feel so primitive that momentum can translate into an irrepressible need to taste what we see, smell, offer, or simply imagine based on our previous experiences.
And any of those things have to have something in common: are carbohydrates. Well
must know that no matter what the item that you provide the taste, but simply, regardless of their QUALITY OF SWEET.

If you are willing to follow the advice I've given (which are restricted in carbohydrates) has always carry food and drinks, but do not contain carbohydrates , and note that the effect is as magical as the legitimate sugars. Use your wits and have always hand-made sweets with artificial sweeteners and have an extra advantage: when a fat man who is taking care experiential suffers a setback, he feels, as we talked, the normal need to eat sweets. As very few can resist the urge, eat, but then they feel "guilty" for eating things they increase their fat, so that guilt is transformed into a new conflict that may have need to eat again eclipse sweet things, and do, what they cause the same feeling and from then on ....
However, if faced with the need to feel sweetness in your mouth, get it with food and drinks that you know do not contain carbohydrates, but a synthetic sweetener inert and harmless, will not feel guilty, so the whole thing ends with the last drink or snack.

Trivia.

few years ago, a young lawyer told me that experience comes in handy now.
One day afternoon, was arguing bitterly with her husband (normal couples normal fight).
In full discussion, it was actually said "all things" suena el timbre. Se montó rápidamente una escena de paz y armonía para disimular, y se abrió la puerta. Era una colega que hacía una semana había convenido con mi paciente (y esta había olvidado) venir a su casa para que ella la aconsejara sobre un pleito que estaba defendiendo.
Con gran disimulo, el esposo se abrigó, saludo muy cortésmente a ambas, y se retiró de la escena con el pretexto de una diligencia (mutis por el foro, que le dicen).
Pero hete aquí que la colega, aparte de muchas carpetas, como es de rigor en los abogados, traía en la otra mano un primoroso paquetito de masas secas para acompañar el té.
Apoyó el paquete en la mesa del comedor, lo abrió y, I told my patient, in these moments of anger and relief contained frustrated, felt almost irrepressible desire to eat them all. But it was agreed that on Thursday last week we had been talking of that a while ago I've told you, and decided to implement my advice.
Under the guise of heating water for tea, went into the kitchen, put the kettle on the fire, opened the refrigerator and poured a generous portion of some kind of dessert at that time had become fashionable among my patients (which is the brainchild of one of them): a delicious scrambled eggs and apples, artificially sweetened and flavored with vanilla and juice de limón, que se cocina junto con un puñado de nueces picadas, que se sirve bien frío, en una compotera, y coronado con una cucharada de crema chantillí (hecha con crema de leche, edulcorante y un toque de esencia de vainilla), o con crema sin batir espolvoreada con canela molida.
-Me lo comí- me relataba mi paciente –y automáticamente me sentí mejor. Cuando llegué al comedor con la tetera humeante, mi amiga me ofreció una de las masas que se veían estupendas. ¡No!, le dije, no quiero, gracias, me estoy cuidando, quiero adelgazar. Pero lo más notable era que, realmente, ¡no sentí deseos de comerlas!
Fin de la anécdota.

If you still have prepared an array of sweet but not fattening things in order to prevent this type of emergency, in a difficult situation decides to consume carbohydrates, your unconscious will surely overshadow the setback is intended to increase the conflict that supposedly protected, thus diluting the impact of the new problem, or the aggravation of a previous one.

Space Blanket Curtains

Delivery Delivery Delivery

What very quickly and easily get
not to last you a long time.
What it costs you get a lot of work,
will never go away from you.

(where understand that it is essential to make his bones in a gym to be the person called upon to be )


Sixteenth Hypothesis


IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY THINNING PROCESS



In every book he boasts, referring to these issues, we recommend exercises to accelerate achievement .
Wow, is it that we will never agree one hundred percent?

Of course I agree with physical activity. If it is reasonable and intelligently planned. If affords pleasure to do it and does not interfere with daily activity needed and who performs it, is very healthy. So there we agree.
The reason why it is performed, is what may be a challenge.
If you feel better, to gain more flexibility and freedom of movement, so that our physiology leave even more correctly, to feel more relaxed and clearer mind after realizing it, I also agree.
If the sole purpose of "lose weight faster," I am totally against .

not that the argument to be used as an incentive (like a good incentive, but a lousy story).
"Rush is the worst of the vices of man" , says an old Chinese aphorism, and I totally agree with him, at least in regard to the rush to lose weight, as we have discussed already.
If weight loss is too fast, the chances of abandoning the attempt are very high (at this point, I suppose, that has to be fully convinced of this.)

Any type of exercise is recommended from the standpoint of increased energy expenditure to produce (except for major efforts in adolescents, for reasons we discussed in the previous chapter). Then to claim that if not done no achievements, as I read in dozens of publications, is a long way.

There are plenty of people who stubbornly refuse to do them, because they have the time or simply because they displace.
I have often heard from patients with fats very important comment on the shame they feel to share a physical activity in the same place and at the same time they do men and women who wear resplendent bodies.
They are between a rock and a hard place: they have played, if not lose weight do not exercise, but will not lose weight unless you exercise. Invades a lot of confusion. Back in the

seventies, if my memory does not betray me, it became fashionable to aerobics. Many colleagues, or professors of gymnastics, flooding the media recommending the race alternated with jogging and fast walking, as an excellent method, economic and not at all embarrassing, consuming carbohydrates accumulated as fat deposit (actually they said "burn off the calories ....")
legions I've seen in parks, and walks along the Parana, at all hours of the day, running fatigadísimos who knows how many miles every morning and every evening (and even in the scorching midday torturous summer).
I've always suspected that they rate the quality of their effort based on the empirical calculation of the amount of perspiration that soaks.

Proper footwear, sportswear to tone ... run like banshees and thirsty at the approach of the oasis, in an hour or two, preferably three times a week.

useless waste of time and effort, in my view.

same thing could be achieved simply walking (and many, above, save the deterioration of his lower limbs, according to the trauma, occurs in the short or the long run if we persist in the activity of jogging or running for a long time, especially if it carries a significant deadweight adiposis).

way, that is the simple secret: walk, so just that .
course, anyone would think to eliminate as much sweat just walking, which practices it should accumulate as many miles as to amount to go around the world in just one year. But it is not necessary at all like Marathon.

really know very few people who have one or two hours a few times a week, to begin walking at a brisk pace.
And, as expected, the majority who do not have the time to do physical fitness or the desire necessary, does not directly nothing.

But the issue is not as complex as it looks, let's see:

The main effort of an hour's walk takes place in the first twenty or twenty-five minutes after the start (which is the time to put everything in motion). Then: Why spend an hour if you can buy more or less the same in just twenty minutes?

The advice I give to my patients, and now you are walking JUST TWENTY MINUTES A DAY (if they are able to do this activity twice, morning and night, for example, results are, necessarily, a hundred percent better).
so soon. I assure you that alone is sufficient, it makes practical sense and the results are magnificent.
The idea is to take a walk, NO MATTER WHAT SPEED, occasionally glancing at his watch. To be ten minutes into the march, they start their back (which has inputs for another ten minutes), and the day's work is already done.
speed step being at first very slow. In the end no matter how far reaching one in ten minutes, but simply walk twenty. I always tell them to be very graphic, it does not matter if he starts to pace out walking his turtle.
The point is that week after week, month after month, slowly, the speed of travel is to step up gradually. The ideal will be to walk comfortably briskly only after five or six months into the business.
But: progress should be daily, Monday to Sunday, rain or shine (finally not a day of rain in that it does not stand twenty minutes. And if even that for, then go ahead, umbrellas and boots Waterproof and A walk in the rain! it is beautiful.)

No matter how busy your life is not in the world anyone who can not spend such a short space to be alone with himself. Because that is another advantage of the walk: it allows one to be alone with yourself, and we all need a daily recreation like this (and much more in need who are often busy.) Look like clarifying their ideas, or enjoy the fantastic is "sweet to think of anything" that holds a walk of only twenty minutes.

I have patients who have both the amateur little while every day, that give it the same importance as the hours of sleep. One is aimed less, but to them the case. What is one to do? Nobody

sweating for just such a short time to walk slowly, but remember that assess the activity carried out by the moisture that has gotten on your clothes, is just another fantasy that makes magical thinking.

Last thought: There are many people
by unfortunate circumstances, an accident for example, are unable to walk or do any exercise.
If you are required to use for a long time or perhaps permanently, a wheelchair, say, and feels the need to lose weight, do not worry MUST NOT ANY KIND exercise to get thin. Only

I recommend you be very strict in choosing their food.
Their energy expenditure is to be so low that small amounts of carbohydrates consumed daily have to hinder your progress.
I have met many in these conditions, and found that invariably offset its losses with God many other skills that are really enviable. One is patience.

Mens Waxing Findlay, Ohio

seventeen sixteen fifteen

blog index for

"I have come quickly.
- Apura step!
"I would fatigue. "You would have
party earlier.
"I just hate getting up early.
-... Are you sure you hurry?

(s the assumption that you would expect right? But it's where you'll find that after reading it will have to cope alone with no father to care for him, my dear reader. This may not be found, as it always has done, a list where you are told what to eat breakfast on Monday, Tuesday lunch, snack or dinner on Thursday, Saturday. No sir, but you will now decide what to drink in every moment of every day. Will surely find it uncomfortable, but if structured and managed diets have not been successful, taking this time to "outcome" within the meaning of perpetuating the achievements of each of the ensuing- why Why not try freedom? )


Fifteenth Hypothesis
MY PROPOSAL


The universal story of all book about obesity is like me, more or less, I have followed so far: the first, author's explanation of his thinking on the subject, and in the end, "The Diet" that allow you to achieve the accomplishments you've always dreamed. The first part

have respected. Say that so far I've ported orthodox, but it comes at the end and the thing I was a bit complicated.

When in 1983 I finished writing "No more diets' I got in touch with Dr. Florencio Escardó to beg him to me preface. I sent a copy of the original, and he, after reading it, I sent a letter (which was the first in a brief correspondence we had for some months) which gave me his impression of the work, and which refused to preface stating simply that the title was cheating :
- "The book is called STOP THE DIET, but includes a" - protested.
Although all conceivable arguments tried to convince him that if I wanted the reader to learn to eat correctly, was, there was no formula to tell how and why ingest from then on. I found it impossible, therefore, not include a list of desirable.
But to no avail: not prefaced.

Basically, now I think in part he was right.
If he were alive and I asked you to do a foreword to this blog, I think this time not even answer my letter. After reading the same thing you've read so far, see annotated list of foods "allowed" and division into five stages, as I did in my four previous works, he had fallen so badly that even would have taken work to send me a note that only contained the word NO!, which I understand ... This time would understand their refusal (one is older and has learned some things.)
A twenty-three years that attempt, my thinking, inevitably, has matured, and I think it would be foolish to now include the list so formal, it was "essential part" of my previous works, for reasons I will try to argue.


There is no book in history to have 100% of fans (except telephone books, obviously).
It occurs to me that the books have been written in order to "solve" the problems caused by the fat must be less enthusiastic to have, though some, at the time, became best-sellers.
But even imagine that such publications should not be middle ground: either one is fanatically in favor, or stubbornly opposed. And I think that one side must go to the other with great frequency (which until yesterday the proposal seemed great, now you may think it is a literal madness or a scam, and vice versa), "everybody talks as fair as they think they have done in the fair. "
Maybe this is the book (now a blog) on \u200b\u200bthe item less adept harvest. I am aware of it since I decided to undertake the daunting task of writing.
Very few readers who can handle the truth (digest, I mean) I recognize that it is very cruel and disturbing. Are many more prefer to comply with the deception, that is, a priori, more benign and comforting.
Unfortunately the evidence says that in these cases, almost anyone can do anything to desist in their attitude
is why I feel I should dedicate this hypothesis to all those who understood the message.
I'm so convinced that everything I told you I feel the urgent need to apologize to all those who have not been convincing, because of the awkwardness with which, perhaps, I put forward my arguments.
Those who have understood I appreciate and admire your ability to understand.

Many (perhaps most) of you reading this work, may at first be in full compliance with its concepts, but when they see, for example, that the thinning they get (if they really have Fat deposition be able to lose) is more slowly than had been calculated, will surely be "the other side."
The less (which, obviously, I'd like to be "most") understand and apprehend all this, so you have no choice but to put in an uncompromising position of obedient followers of the idea , and never attempt be the second captain . Why is dedicated to them as follows.
The physiologic thinning
have different times to unnatural emaciation.
If you have experience in this latter type of "achievements" will feel a little confused when you realize that things are not "at their own pace, but I certainly accept your own pace physiology. Finally, if a long time that is fat what does he care to invest much less than a quarter of that is needed to gain weight, and certainly not be more than a small fraction of what still has to live to achieve something that has to be final? (I realize that this sounds too romantic, but it can not find another way express myself.)

Could I write here a long list of foods you could consume in order to lose weight, or desengordar, depending on its condition and its possibilities, but I thought more consistent scoring a list of what should not to make it so only you who can handle the way of "following orders." (The captain is who it claims to do, the sailor is the one who decides how to do it.)

will now read the advice, I intend to accept, with respect to what I think should be here on your way of eating. At the end of them talk about how to control their achievements.
What follows is not reasoning that the product I developed, after so many years and patients, based on the evidence daily.

This hypothesis is divided into three stages:

1 - thinning from fat.
2 - The depletion from the thinness.
3 - How to measure achievements.

Part
(How to lose weight from fat)

As my intention is not to change a conflict, your fat, by a more cruel: the hipercuidado obsessed with their food in order to resolve , we ask you to try to shed all preconceptions concerning the subject. That
try to imagine who has never done anything to lose weight, and this is the first time we do something about it. Who plays this is their first attempt (and hopefully the last).


When I say "last attempt" is because that at the end desire and not need to do anything else . And if you ever falter, the next time you come back to try again also to imagine that this is the first attempt on his life.


Since I was a very young child, I was disgusted by the failure not or the other by itself. Whenever I asked for explanations when denied something, or do anything that would bother me to do or what did not seem right to me, then, short approach.
Lucky for me, my parents always used the technique of - No, because .....-, and the - Yes, that .....-.
course, is the technique that we adopted with my wife to educate our children, because, thank God, she was educated in the same way. And, of course, the one I use with my patients whenever they recommend taking some attitude or taking any medications. I mean, adapting the speech to the culture of each, why of this attitude, or action of the medication prescribed. Experience has taught me that if the patient knows how the drug being prompted, or attitude that is encouraged, works better with therapy, and the effects of it are positive (apart, has every right to know what's eating or what is the reason for the advice given, how they are manifested adverse effects, and how it should be noted that its beneficial action is happening).

From now on I will use the same method with you in relation to the elements that will advise you eat or avoid.

All foods and beverages we eat to nourish (Or because it simply offers us pleasure to do so), if we see from the point of view of farming capacity can be divided into three groups:

1 - Those who do not get fat or hinder weight loss. (From now on, "FOOD or DRINK OF ONE TYPE").
No matter how much or how often you use them, lack the capacity to gain weight. Obviously, there are those who do not contain carbohydrates, those who have so little of them that their rates do not influence, or those who have in large quantities, but because of their chemical composition, you are unable to absorb our digestive system .

2 - The less fattening and can hinder the path to thinness. (From now on, "FOOD AND BEVERAGES OF TYPE TWO").
are the ones who should be consumed with a daily maximum limit, because if they are abused in quantities or frequencies, in its composition a percentage of hydrates enough carbon to overcome our basic needs, so we'll start to keep them reservation in our adipose tissue.

3. - The very fattening, which hinder the attainment of the intended. (From now on "FOOD or DRINK TYPE THREE").
will call and all containing a large amount of carbohydrate per unit of measurement. They'll see, should be consumed only eventually.

Let's see them in more detail:

(very important clarification: the book on which this blog - "The secret of obesity" - was written and intended, originally, the inhabitants of Argentina.'s Why has to read names must not be familiar way of speaking of his country, for example, what we call "offal" for the English as "offal" our "dulce de leche" is "blancmange" Chileans.'m sorry you have need, perhaps a dictionary at hand to understand fully all that follows, but there is another method. If you encounter any unintelligible speech with a comment let me know and I will try to "translate")


TYPE FOOD AND DRINK ONE:
As virtually no carbohydrates (carbs) can be consumed without limits. I refer to all products of animal origin (any animal), including those that are canned, preserved, such as tuna or shellfish, even in sauces or oil (the end that can hold the sauce is very poor, and oil does not contain sugar). Also be consumed burgers of any kind meat (beef, chicken, turkey, etc..), and any type of offal.
must excepted to milk and some food from it are developed and then discuss more when we talk about the other two types, and some meat or manufactured goods that are made explicit in dealing with the type three.
cheeses also belong to type one, apart from clear that are an important source of protein , fat people choose (or are advised) to consume the "mush" (the cheese is classified as "soft dough "," medium hard "and" hard ", according to the characteristics that give them parking periods to being subjected after manufacture and before sale). The soft cheeses are very young, very special few exceptions, "for its production and sale requires no more than two or three days of aging, which is why they are so cheap, but in such a short time sugar-lactose-containing - no item can be transformed into non-carbohydrate-lactic acid, so it should not be eaten except on very special occasions. The semi-hard or hard ground do not contain lactose, so its use must be at will.
string cheese, cottage cheese, although some have lactose, can be used to replace the ricotta (this should be avoided because it contains carbohydrates). Clear that here is "a difficulty" you should elaborate. But it is very simple, place in a saucepan four or five gallons of whole milk or the milk contains very few solids that can extract them, "add four or five tablespoons of vinegar of any kind and warm on the stove. When you purchase a certain temperature to "cut", remove from heat, place pasta in a colander a cloth tight mesh (a piece of old sheet is adequate) and strain. When the whey is drained, all this operation must be performed in a pool, plenty of water drop on the resulting paste and stir with your fingers to remove the remains of vinegar and still contains lactose. Drain a good time, express what has been achieved using the canvas that was used as a filter and store in refrigerator. Normally four or five gallons of whole milk gets about three quarts kilo of cheese. Use it as if ricotta (my patients say it is tastier than it).

foods belonging to the vegetable kingdom can also be consumed without restriction, except some who see a little later. The unlimited consumption include nearly all fresh, canned, frozen or pickles (pickles) and fresh vegetables, dried or canned (beans and beans, peas, chickpeas, lentils and soybeans, contain carbohydrates that are nonabsorbable for humans, this is the reason for his irrestricción).
Dried fruits, nuts, almonds, cashews, hazelnuts, pistachios and peanuts, and oilseeds such as sunflower seeds, contain, such as legumes, carbohydrates are not absorbed by humans, so it should not be limits on their consumption.
Dried mushrooms or mushrooms add, almost, no carbohydrates, so it should not be limited. Can prepare with them, you know, exquisite and delicate sauces.
The palm hearts are also consumer unrestricted. Like the bean sprouts, bamboo and alfalfa.
With regard to wheat germ and brewer's yeast, but I think that the properties which they are responsible are irrelevant, they can be consumed in the usual dose for you.

beverages that contain no carbohydrates are, obviously, water and soda, and all infusions with water to prepare coffee, tea, mate (cooked or light bulb) and teas (do not recommend using daily coffee instant. If they are consumed in large quantities and very often, we noticed that contain sufficient amount of carbohydrates absorbed as to hinder the weight loss) . They do not contain sugar distilled liquors such as whiskey, brandy, vodka, brandy, gin, pisco, tequila, etc. shaque. Fermented beverages such as wine, cider, champagne and beer, contain a significant amount of sugar, which makes "consumables" only on very special occasions. There
market artificially sweetened soft drinks, which can also be consumed without limits, is warmly Cola nut and lemon-lime several that are bottled with the label of "Light", "Diet" or some other synonyms giving the idea of \u200b\u200b"safety." The fruit taste with no lemon-lime we have experienced but the result is that they contain sufficient amounts of carbohydrates to obstruct the process of thinning, so do not recommend it, except eventually. To make things easier, of all beverages that are considered "diet" just eat the black or the clear, as are cloudy with spiked casually with artificial clouding, and the times that we experience ketones disappeared from the urine of those who take vitamins. I really do not know why.
The "Juice concentrates (liquid or powder), whether called" Diet "or" Light "or" Free " should also be consumed occasionally. Lemon juice is also TYPE ONE drink, but I always recommend drinking no more than two or three of them (or the equivalent in bottled pure juice) per day. It is very useful for dressing or preparing meals refreshments.

The condiments (pepper, paprika, saffron, cinnamon, cumin, etc.) And seasonings of any kind can be easily included in the category of FOOD TYPE ONE, though his figure marquillas containing starches or sugars. Mayonnaise and mustard sauces are a good example in this area there are several brands that try to capture consumer attention with the famous Diet or Light labels. Really seems inappropriate, since any mayonnaise or mustard made can be consumed even in its composition includes starch or sugar (in the end one has to eat a tablespoon a kilogram of them, of the supposedly "diet" it is argued that they are because they have been changed much of the oil that normally composed of starch, since it contains fewer calories. ")
artificial extracts such as vanilla used to flavor the whipped cream, for example, can be used without problems. You can also use the unsweetened cocoa powder as it expends in shops devoted to pastry. And the same goes for artificial coloring.
Artificial sweeteners are suitable for inclusion in this first classification if we except those who are sold in powder form: they contain a good portion of carbohydrates (usually maltodextrin), so that should not be used only on very special occasions. Those sold in liquid or tablet, regardless of brand, can be consumed without limits.
vinegars, no matter what their origin, can be used without limit. (Aceto Balsamico is included.) Edible oils also can be used without any restrictions. No matter where they are removed, they are one of the few products (along with the butter and margarine) with 0% carbohydrate.

The concentrated broth that is sold in cubes can be eaten without problems, but not those that come in envelopes, as they have an interesting amount of starch. The powder sold-packaged in envelopes, with the name of diet is not nice, at least the taste of my patients, but if you fancy you do not think there objection to consume from time to time.
Gels Diet
yes they are actually (if we agree that this time "Diet" means "no carbs"). There are plenty of "dessert" bearing the name without being in reality, should be avoided daily consumption of them.

Gums "Diet" or "Light" can be consumed without restrictions. Not the candy or using such names, or those labeled "Free" (free is English word meaning 'Free ...' , but in these cases, literally be interpreted as 'sugar free cane ' because they contain other types of carbohydrates fattening (or "antiadelgazantes"). And here is the perfect place for an enlightening comment: those who are dedicated to life sciences SUGAR use the word as a synonym for carbohydrate (eg "Starch is a polysaccharide, a sugar very long chain, and a cellulose chain sugar so long that humans can not metabolize.") For the rest of us Sugar is sucrose, the carbohydrate containing the sugar cane and sugar beet primarily (it is a disaccharide composed of one glucose and fructose). Thinking that way makes you fall into the trap: "This candy is diet because it is made with sugar (it's free)", which does not clarify is that the parent is, generally, dextrin, starch or sugar ( since it is extracted), and is also a carbohydrate.


TYPE FOOD AND BEVERAGE
DOS can not be included under this heading to any of the animal kingdom: they are type one and type three, except the cream.
The cream has very little lactose, so if you consume less than two hundred grams per day, his thinning will not find any difficulty (takes the place of milk in teas, and it can be made with Chantilly Cream and a variety of sauces types). If you ever exceeded this measure will not be problems.

The plant kingdom include polished rice (which should be thoroughly washed, soaked for a while and wash again before cooking. This is to remove a large portion of starch that consists, as do the East). The "rice" and "mist" or "Parvolizados" (those that however much you boil them not "pass") can not be stripped of their excess starches much they wash them or soak, so I advise not to use. Finally, rice-lovers like me, "just love the ancient polished rice. ( Warning: after washing, soaking and washing again, cooks very quickly, "seven or eight minutes is enough. ) Try to consume no more than once or twice a week, adding condiments that come to mind, or combining it with what you want.
This group also fruit and tomatoes.
Regarding fruits do not recommend eating more than a quarter kilo per day. This recommendation does not claim that they are even at a time, is rather simple: half a kilogram should meet for two days. If someone consumes half a kilo today, tomorrow should not eat them, because tomorrow the've eaten today, do you understand?
All fruits are allowed, except for oranges, grapes and bananas. They contain a high proportion of sugars or starches, per unit, although, again, if they are consumed very occasionally have to hinder your progress. With respect the watermelon melon and pineapple, the recommended daily amount not to exceed half a kilo.
The dehydrated should pre-hydrate before weighing. Once you know how much of plums, peaches, pears. in the form of "pass" entering fourth kilo after soaking, can eat the same amount as the purchase.
are commercially packaged fruit stands whose labels "low calorie." We've tried them all, and we have proved, so I advise not to adopt them.
Tomatoes also can be consumed, while respecting the portion of two hundred fifty grams per day maximum. Can be used fresh or canned (the latter are used for preparing sauces, for example). For the "fresh" can give you want to use. If you want to fill them, apart from the tuna, you can use corned beef, pate de foie, deviled ham or corned beeff. The latter are added with a large amount of starch, but as the portions of each are usually very rare, I do not think should set limits.
Maize, as corn, crushing, or grinding, has a high proportion of starches, so too will eventually be consumed.
The bread crumbs, if using, and only modestly batter should not be overlooked.


TYPE FOOD AND THREE
These are the meal of any cereal, sugar (sucrose), sweets and honey. Have sung the praises of honey, but almost everything she says is false and what is true is irrelevant: Da energy!, Yes, but no more than an equivalent portion of sugar or flour, vitamins have !, true, but no more than an equivalent portion of fruit ... or olives, for example, brings minerals! it is also true, but all natural products are provided by, It's magic!, are lies, " That's magical thinking "honey is just sugar syrup , as is" glucose " when it transformed all the carbohydrates we eat honey, which directly is, do not even need the time and expense needed for the processing chemical. The honey is absorbed immediately after consumption: it could mean that a food is "fattening faster."
Some vegetables like potatoes, sweet potatoes, pumpkins, squash, beets and cassava contain such a large proportion of carbohydrates, which should be eaten very sparingly.

milk and yogurt are also food of this kind.
also commended the milk for its alleged virtues, but this is another exaggeration consumer product market. You do not have more calcium than the egg, much less cheese, or more vitamins than vegetables, but has a lot of sugar, called lactose, which makes that if we eat enough to prevent us from fattening or slimming, and for the same reason that our intestines are filled with gases in foam we produce compact or diarrhea. We are mammals, apparently the milk has to be one of our staples, but that only happens in babies, in their gut that produce an enzyme called "lactase, which has the function to transform the lactose into glucose. As we grow the amount we produce lactase decreases, so that the digestion of lactose each It is increasingly difficult, and not being absorbed into our small intestine, and there comes the bulk fermentation occurs that so upset. It is not at normal an adult mammal drink milk at last man is the only one doing it, and remember: it is the only mammal in creation that is "steals" others. The fact that we take every day is an event just usual, and not at all common sense "normalize" what is just usual.
Many physicians, especially gynecologists, recommend that their patients are about menopause milk in abundance in order to avoid or delay the appearance of the dreaded osteoporosis. Actually, as we said above, I disagree with that recommendation. First, because as we have seen their side effects are more important than their supposed "therapeutic virtues" and second, because there are many other products not so offensive that have a greater amount of calcium in its composition, is more: less water and salt , virtually everything we eat contains calcium. By day's end, a person who is eating (or fairly well), but no test or drop of milk or yogurt, has consumed much calcium your body can not absorb in full, third, because in the last of the tablet cases Daily calcium carbonate or citrate takes the place of a large serving of milk, and are very low cost, room, and finally, because only one in four women develop the disease, and destined to suffer can not help it, just , consuming extra amounts of calcium. Bone metabolism is extremely complex, but, thank God, pharmacologists have developed compounds that are collectively known as bisphosphonates, and solve the problem of osteoporosis (your doctor will explain everything about the subject.)

PARADOX: skim milk, such that all fat consumed in order to "save calories" is the most fattening. One liter of whole milk has no more than fifty grams of lactose, a skim: eighty.
With regard to yoghurts, say no more than "spunk", are very rich (for me, personally, I love. I do much damage, the consumer never, but I love), but have no extra nutrient and yes about the same amount of lactose than milk that gave rise-and low-fat, like her, much more. There

sausages are delicious, at least for my taste and that of my patients, such as bologna, salami, sausages and similar Vienna, Milan salami and sausages. You should know containing starches (some more than 50%), so have eaten very occasionally. Say: when the event is impossible to circumvent ... You understand, right?

Note: surely in its gastronomic culture include foods and beverages that are not spelled out here, if so let me know and we analyze it.

Come to the point.

From now on, or when it so decides, follow as closely as possible the simple directions outlined below:

Eat and drink what you want.
* cooked as you like.
* In the amounts it deems needed to be fed (the only two things that absolutely forbid my patients are hungry bear unless you feel it at some point where you can not delete ", and feel guilt if for any reason, you have consumed inappropriate or beverages).
* With the frequencies you want or can.
* Less any food or drink TYPE THREE.
* Only recommended maximum amounts of food and beverage
TYPE TWO.
* Do this daily.
* eventually consume any food and beverage
TYPE THREE (but only eventually).

So simple, so easy. Clear that simple and easy if you have enough patience to wait for the results at the time they occur (as decided by their physiology, that is), not when you want it .


CLARIFICATIONS ESSENTIAL

Eat and drink what you want: means you can eat and drink any of the ONE TYPE. As they provide virtually no carbohydrates equivalent to its economy, there is no need to exclude any, but not of their liking or that cause you some discomfort (allergy, for example).
With regard to alcoholic beverages that make up the ONE TYPE of course limit has to put his conscience. Cooking

as you like: mean that as there is no way of cooking that add carbohydrates to your meals, is the same as that eaten raw, boiled, grilled to fried. So you can enjoy any kind of cooking, according to their customs or their preferences. (Note: I am referring strictly to the "way of cooking", not to prepare for cooking.)

In quantities it considers necessary to feel satisfied; always know that anything multiplied by any number gives nothing. If the food you eat contain virtually no carbohydrates, or contain, but they are nonabsorbable, no matter because we multiply the daily ration. Of course, I mean ONE TYPE.
For the DOS TYPE do have to set limits because, as they contain more carbohydrate equivalent, if eaten in large quantities and very often go beyond the daily quantities needed, so that our bodies begin to save them in as fat. (This mistake is usually with fruit: many people consume more than a quarter kilo a day, that is why things are going wrong.)

As often as they wish or can: you hear out there, especially from the mouth of the coordinators of the SHGs, the advice to "eat something every two hours. "
This is another useless recommendations than create in their followers (usually most of them) the idea of \u200b\u200bbeing unable to be met, so they decide to abandon the attempt. Not many people as masters of their time to "stop" with no matter what else they are doing to eat a Vienna sausage, a boiled quail egg or a succulent carrot (of not too large), each one hundred twenty minutes . Less

any food or beverage type three: those with a large amount of carbohydrates per unit of , unless you do it eventually, as we have seen.


When you come to my office an overweight patient in order to lose weight, give you a primer on which contains a list of everything that may or may consume.
I always recommend starting with ONE TYPE foods for one to two weeks. This indication is to see results soon, which will encourage him to continue to exist and allow me to go into their conflicts to try to imagine, between them, a strategy to solve them.
then advise gradually include the type two, during a period of three or four weeks. After that time agree that take a "day off" each week. Generally, these twenty-four hours of freedom elapse between 18:00 to 18:00 Saturday and Sunday, but those times are not so strict. Say, more practical, snack between Saturday and Sunday (may as well take advantage of the lunch on Saturday, the output or the party that night, breakfast, lunch and afternoon tea on Sunday. What's Not small feat for someone who is "weight loss plan.") There has permitted the consumption of any food and beverage TYPE THREE.
The secret order of the day off is that LEARN TO STOP consuming fattening items. After seven or eight days off will find, invariably, it is not at all difficult return to everyday eating that we have agreed, so if you ever have an uncompromising (or a craving) in the middle of the week, in what is consumed is not the agreement will not feel guilt for "inflicting the rules" because they have learned, trained, to stop and return to consume what allow it to continue slimming

When on vacation, my suggestion is that during the duration of eat what you like (finally no one is fat so has eaten or drunk during the holidays past, but by what they consumed before, and from there until you choose to ask me). The advice I give in these cases is that leave their resting place which eat or drink it . I mean, at that time, the prettiest of the year, to develop such activities that make you eat carbohydrates are metabolized in the same place that consume them (always say: - "What you eat and drink there, leave it there" -). That much if you walk to the mountain, for example, or to swim most of the time you can if you the sea. The sea water is always between 15 and 20 degrees cooler than the body. The indoor temperature is constant most jealously guarded by our body. The 37 º C inside should always be 37 º (a few tenths more or less). When one is immersed in water that are, say, 18 ° C, it must maintain, at all costs, its internal temperature at 37, which means a tremendous energy expenditure (that is the reason why you feel so exhausted and hungry after a day at the beach or pool) .
not matter, then how bad coma in these periods, excess carbohydrates will leave there.

A competing athletes always recommend, even from the first week, consume starches before the competition. Example: lunch, a good portion of pasta in the afternoon if you have to participate in a game (chess, abstain). In the end, what they have to leave lunch on the court. In such cases it is more than eating carbohydrates slow absorption (hence the advice to eat starches) that the rapid assimilation, such as simple sugars (honey, cane sugar, sweets, glucose) as the absorption of these is done so quickly that in half the war have run out of energy.

If for any reason will commit transgressions, I recommend "committing big." This is one explanation: the absorption of carbohydrates in our small intestine is not "infinite" . Exceeded a certain amount of carbohydrates, our intestines saturated and can no longer absorb any more. Say, following examples that a slice of pizza is enough to saturate the intestinal absorptive capacity, so if at some time seen in the "terrible situation" of having to consume it, do not eat a single serving, enough to sear Coma with them!, so that for many days to feel disgust, only to listen to the word "pizza." After all, what more than a portion will go to the toilet (with apologies for the lack of elegance of the reasoning).
What you need to banish from their customs is "try." Everyone thinks that prove something is unimportant, but in fact the opposite is true. "A little of this not to fatten, they think all (which is strictly true.) The problem is that time again to reason "A little of this one not conspire with my fat. Therein lies the problem: if one adds a bit more on that a little of that, at the end of the day will have consumed a quantity of sugars or starches to make your thinning process stops. That's why I always recommend to my patients: - "small transgressions, never!. Major violations, if not often done, should not affect too much on their achievements "-

If you already got your thin or is accordance with the body that has achieved (which is almost impossible: no one is satisfied with the body to get ... or the fortune you get), you can include in your daily diet no more than a quart of whole milk or a serving of yogurt (which is not possible with added carbohydrate sweeteners) per day. You can also consume, eventually, some cold cuts containing starch, such as bologna, Vienna sausages, etc.
With regard to creamy cheeses such as mozzarella or Port Salut (which does not mean the health . In fact, very cleverly, advertisers put him surely at the request of a dairy industry, the "healthy paronym "the name they gave the Trappist monks in Brittany, in the nineteenth century, who lived in the monastery Port du Salut" safe haven ". Them to survive, they developed a very special kind of cheese-very French custom, which, in honor of his monastery, named that way: salvation port), it has to happen is nothing wrong if you eat them, but a large dairy company will have removed the letter T to PORT and perhaps within a time change for the D T SALUT.



Part Two (How to lose weight from wasting)

is not very common, but occurs with some frequency, consult me \u200b\u200blean thin people, or directly "skinny" in order to "fatten" , as I approach it.
always tell them that should not really fat but thin .
often confusion is rife in them when they hear those words, but rather settle down when I explain that losing weight simply means become thin.
When fat becomes thin you say "thin", and everyone agrees with the expression. For when a person becomes thin skinny, although at first it difficult to assimilate, eventually agreeing that "has lost."

The thin body lean look as unsightly as the fattest of the fat. But worse, we considered timely, a fat or thin may become well is permitted, but a thin lean can do nothing to improve their appearance.
generally believe that getting "fat" will solve your problem. For this act, believing it logical, doing the opposite of what the fat that seek its thinness, as carbohydrates are eaten (actually, they harass them).
What is not aware they were born, for those rare circumstances of genetics, with an inability to accumulate fat reserves, then, if you consume a large amount of carbohydrates they have to do at the expense of a very sharp decline in protein, so that proteins do not consume, and are vital to renew your body almost quarterly, have to get them out of their generally poor muscles, which will increasingly be less bulky, which will help your image is getting worse every day.
As previously mentioned, the doctors we consulted tell them what they expect: - Eat plenty of things to get fat! - So when you see such opposite results were feeling increasingly confused.

When a of them refers to me, I explain the same thing you've read so far. So should he, too, eating the same as someone who wants to lose weight from fat, but this time the recommendations are more drastic.
Usually such patients are very appetite. And they are for two reasons:
First, because its nature is.
Second, because, invariably, your stomach is always full of carbohydrates.

first thing one has to do is convince the difference between eating and feed. The second is to try to understand that if you continue with this attitude of how much to eat something "fattening" find, silhouetted has no way to get worse over time. The third is to follow, including more than fat, at the foot of the letter directed.
And this time the indications are somewhat cruel.
always recommend you do not eat any solid food (or drink anything with sugar) out of lunch and dinner.
should breakfast with only one or two cups of any artificially sweetened tea.
From then until noon should not consume anything that mitigates that has to feel hungry by midmorning. It achieved that by sitting down to eat his lunch feel so hungry that he will have to incorporate a good amount of nutrients (usually I recommend many foods ONE TYPE and beverages, and only some type two). By midafternoon, as in breakfast, a bland tea to "fool the stomach" to the dinner. And at dinner has to act like that at lunch.

also advise them to perform vigorous exercise. That will make your muscles grow volume and improve its appearance. The go to a gym is an excellent indicator, with the proviso that no teenager should perform exercises that require much effort, as lifting weights, for example (the "growth plates" of the long bones have not yet ossified, and can damaged by overstrain). But do not worry: if the school that attends is serious, the gym teacher is trained to advise exactly how things should be done according to your age, gender and circumstances. They are professional, have them trust and allow that this time "they are the captain."

ATTENTION: the slimming process from the thinness is much slower than that of the bulge. You should have much more patience than they should hold the fat they want to lose weight.


Part Three
(How to measure the achievements)
L
post to this blog has brought me much pleasure. I really love writing, and subject, must have noticed, I love. As the new friends I am passionate about that because he forge.
But it also gave me headaches. The assumptions sixth, eleventh and twelfth terrified me since I started sketching and until I saw printed on the computer monitor, and finished and my whole taste.
also knew from the beginning, there was another very thorny issue, which talk about how to measure the achievements that you get if you follow my advice about food and how to address their conflict. This is the theme, and this is the time to write.

penultimate book in my (poor fat ...!), commented, as a joke, when the principles of our country were burned in the Plaza de Mayo the elements of torture, they forgot two: Tables weight for age, sex and height, ... and the scales.
At these tables do not even take into account, you have to understand why. But I have no choice but to refer to the scales really are great artifacts of torture (or self-flagellation, as you see them). And they are suffering for what they do to those who use, but worse for the suffering they cause free. Everyone
"control" her weight, her leanness or thinness using them, which to me has always seemed the most erroneous attitudes, and I will try to convince him again (but rest assured, I solemnly swear that this is the last time I try) .

superb as always said my professor of gastroenterology, Dr. Guillermo Ferrari Sel (perhaps one of the greatest physicians that has inhabited this city): "going slowly" .
Who cares how much a woman despite having 130 cm bust, waist, 150, 145, hip, 1.60 m tall?
Who cares how much it weighs a girl of nineteen years and 1.75 m tall, measures 90-70-90 look? Who in their right mind would care about your weight? (Except itself, of course.)

"Losing weight means affinities, not loosened. No matter how much weight you lose one person, but how thin is the view. "

fatness and thinness are aesthetic problems. The thinning is an improvement in aesthetics, and does not exist and never, no scales that can tell if your aesthetic is better or worse.
In the latter case is the sewing tape measure to judge the achievements (or failures). If his hip was 120 cm and is 95 now, is that it is thinner, no matter how much weight is lost in the company.
In my last job they told a parable invented many years ago, and is very educational to me see it:

One night a boy talks to his mother who has no desire to eat, it feels wrong and will go to bed. Mom says her eyes are too bright and that his attitude is unusual, so that puts the palm of your hand in front of the child. As I sensed the feeling very hot, so we decided to locate the thermometer in the armpit. A few minutes warns that mercury mark 39 º C. It gives you a dose of antipyretic, and puts it well wrapped in bed.
When you hear your child asks for food, and get out of bed to watch TV.
again put his hand on the front, cooler note, and again mark the thermometer is now 36.7 º C.
That attitude is what we all face similar cases: first hand on the forehead, then the thermometer in the armpit. End of parable.

The scale is the hand on the forehead. The tape on the thermometer.

- I went down three kilos! -. Right, but how much has lost weight?

always, and very maliciously, I ask my patients, "balanzaadictos": "If you conduct
an exact replica, but pine, La Venus de Milo, what would be fatter, the original marble or wooden replica? -. All the same answer, "The original, because the marble is heavier."
No matter how long delay in explaining that if the replica is accurate both are equally thin. They have so internalized that weight gain is increased still defending stubbornly, most fat of the Venus of stone (even pretend to have understood my reasons and agree with them.)
you will likely feel some compassion for people so stubborn, but I want him in my office with the same dilemma.

It is very easy to "lighten" the people, give them diuretics and laxatives, as do pseudohomeópatas, and losing a good amount of water will weigh less. Please
to run around the square with warm clothing and, ideally, waterproof, and look like the back of the blundering career weighs less than the breaking into it.

In both cases it weighs less "because it's thinner," but because he was somewhat dehydrated.
One liter of water weighs one kilogram, and if by the method to be losing a couple of liters, it weighed two kilos less. But just be lighter for a short while, and that thirst will recover liquid lost in a very short time.

If you are a woman and is about to menstruate, you will notice that weighs between one and three kilos more than the previous week (it is usual), but that does not mean you're fatter, but your body is retaining water in order to dilute their blood to keep as many red blood cells in the days during their menstruation. Naturally

all weigh more in winter than in summer because of cold weather clothes are much heavier than the summer time.

is heavier, too, in the days when the atmospheric pressure is very low (this phenomenon causes retain fluids), which in times of very high pressures (for the opposite effect).

is logical that all we weigh more at night than in the morning and fasting. Much of what we eat and drink in the day, it remains in our body when we sleep, and, of course, that also weighed.

for all, and though it cost a great sacrifice, promises not to get on a scale never.
The most logical, correct and accurate is to be measured. The day she decides to start taking care in your diet, write on a sheet of paper under the date, the outline of bust, waist, hip and thigh (always the same side, since among two tend to be differences of up to two or three inches, the thicker the right side, then use that as a reference-). Also, if you wish, you can control the perimeter of your abdomen, the navel, or another part of your body that decides.
Then, not too often measured again one morning when you wake up (do this forever without clothes and using the same seam tape you used the first time), and write them down beneath the new date, next to the numbers the first measurement.

The "how often" make the controls is a major dilemma. Everyone wants to re-measured at the third or fourth day to start caring. It is an understandable attitude ... but disheartening. I always say that the thinning is like the trees, if one looks at them very often seem never to grow.
The ideal frequency is once per month. That time so seemingly long has advantages. One is that in a month will be enough difference to notice very easily and happily.
Another is that, slowly, letting go of obsessing about "seeing the results." If we are very aware of something, the gains appear to be very slow. If we think about it, seems to occur with great speed.

As the months pass will lengthen the time between steps: at first every thirty days later after every forty .... fifty, etc..

When you discover that your measurements are no longer modified during a reasonable time (say two or three months) and you are safe to eat properly, is likely to have reached its thinness . I mean it deserves by sex, age, circumstances, physical activity and heredity. Remember that from
unless the measures that apply not dream. Moreover, no permits.
If nevertheless not satisfied with the progress (there is very little that is agreement), there is still a chance to change one of the five items that define its thinness: increasing physical activity, but we will discuss in the next chapter.

And if after reading everything from the prologue so far, decides that the balance has to be the chosen mode controlled, sorry lot.

Gay Cruising Spots In Tampa

blog index for

100% of lean women are thin, but only 5% of thin women are slender.

(where means that the change in their body structure is not always due to the "unforgivable" sins of the bad food, but the imponderable genetic designs, the relentless passage of time and things that happen ...)


Fourteenth Hypothesis
the feminine silhouette


All surveys that have been published around fewer say the same thing: 80% of people who consult a physician to lose weight are female.
And that's because fat hundred eighty are women but because that is the percentage of all fat people are , seem or think they might be .

Because you must know that all people who consult us can be divided into three groups:

1 - Those are really fat.

2 - Those seem to be.

3 - Those who think they are without even the appearance.

The first is a real challenge.
The second, a problem. The third one
drama.

If we did a statistic with a large number of cases, the results would be something like:

FIRST GROUP (People really fat)
50% women, 50% male.

SECOND GROUP (look fat but are not):
95% women, 5% males.

third group (think you're fat without even seeming to):
99.9% women, 0.1% males.

Regarding the first group I do not need to make any comment.
The conflict is with the second and third

mid-1992 I consulted a teacher of forty-five and mother of three teenagers.
course came "to lose weight, but my keen eye tuned enough and said I was not fat at all, which he expressed hope a fierce defense of his "state of fatness." But the defense did not happen.
He looked at me unsure of their assessment, and happened to tell the story that sparked his "need to lose weight."
the Saturday before the family was preparing to attend a wedding party. At bath time, his daughter was first. When he finished showering he realized that he had not taken his bath towel, so my mom asked him. My new patient withdrew from each placard, and was achieved, as not many years ago, her daughter twenty-one full body naked.
- What is large, and what a beautiful body you have! - he told me that he thought at that time.
As her turn was imminent, he locked himself in his room, undressed, and look in the mirror could not help but compare your body with the perfect figure of her young daughter who had seen him a few seconds.
- What I'm fat ... I have to do something for my figure! - Was his first reaction.

Anyone would have thought he was right. She also, at age twenty, wearing a body like his daughter.
But now, despite being well fed, as questions arose after rigor, gymnastics play tennis almost every day, its perimeter measurements had increased "alarmingly", and firmness and smoothness of the surface area of \u200b\u200bhis youth, had become a bleak picture for her where the "cellulite" and appeared flaccideces everywhere.

Countless times the female consultation is for similar reasons that I have related.
all believe that the body thickening happens to them over the years is simply the product of a vile relaxation in dietary patterns. But that's not serious: the worst is that all doctors who hear or read, do nothing to reproach them fault "Have been allowed to reach this stage" , and promise them that no matter how old they are or what the genetic combination that has resulted, if they follow the advice of each advertising or giving directions as "prestigious specialists" in women's magazines, in television programs devoted to them or in private, may again have the body of a teen model top (or have it for the first time, if ever enjoyed such a body.)

But everyone: women, doctors and pharmaceutical businesses, advertisers and publishers "forget" about a small detail : SEX FAT WOMEN.

Perdonémosle oblivion. Moreover, suppose that many of them do not even have any idea of \u200b\u200bthe topic and move on to explain, but with one condition: after they know it, please do not do more.

Men and women we differ on many things.
Things that make us different called "sexual characteristics" , of \u200b\u200bwhich there are two groups: the primary and the secondary .
primary sexual characters are the genitals, of course.
secondary sexual characters are what make a woman to have women look, and a son of man, despite having concealed their genitals.
deep voice of man versus the more acute for women, for example. The beard of us opposed to the smooth and hairless female face. Our "Adam's apple" and the "collar of Venus" (the crease that surrounds the base of the neck of all women), and the different distribution of body hair are the most noticeable differences to know everyone.
funny thing is that no one speaks or writes on the secondary sexual character more interesting and attractive that differentiates them from us: FEMALE SEXUAL FAT.

All normal humans are surrounded by a layer of fat that is lodged in the deepest part of the skin almost the entire body surface (and we also have a lot of it inside us.) That
normal adipose tissue is a rare feature: is hormone-DEPENDENT . Depends on the sex hormones (hence the name FAT SEX ...), but not the male, but female ones (hence it's ... FEMALE SEXUAL ).
If we stop a child from, say, nine years next to a boy the same age, both without clothes on his back and his hair cut like no one can tell who she is or who he is.
If we do the same with two teenage girls of seventeen or eighteen, observe the differences are so notable anyone say, with a hundred percent certainty, which is which.
is the "fat female sex" * responsible for the difference so noticeable in the physical aspects of ladies and gentlemen.



* sexual fat has a rough surface. For nothing is like a glass, actually much more like a sponge. The overlying skin has no choice but to copy the irregularities of its surface. Hence the so famous, criticized and UNIVERSAL "orange peel" that all normal women aged fifteen or sixteen years show (it's a way to say, really "hide"). Fat business for cosmetologists who are busy inventing and techniques to achieve cream to get rid of this "anomaly", which, commonly, it is called cellulite .
A men are not interested, I swear I did not look at those details, we look normal. It is only those who bother their carriers, and one understands them, are used to seeing on television and magazine models look thighs and buttocks with perfect smoothness, and they have to think that if the models have bodies as smooth, anyone could Like have it. What they do not realize is that the vast majority of the girls from the catwalks to show that way are nothing more than very young girls makeup so skillfully that show the appearance of girls of about twenty-five years. Many of them have not even begun to menstruate, and many other makes no more than one or two years that have been "developed" and therefore have not had time yet to produce sufficient amounts of female hormones to their layer sexual fat to thicken so that its surface is irregular.
In almost three decades of observing and talking with women, I have never heard of anyone who knows someone who knows of one that had "cellulitis" and "cured." Do you know any women so lucky?


sexual that fat is responsible for women to look rounded bottom, unlike the more muscular and less succulent men. Is she the reason why the ladies have ever cold surfaces of the buttocks and thighs (your partner will confirm that I have reason.) It happens that sexual fat has the same insulating power of the cork temperature (actually the "fat reserve" has almost the same feature), so that the heat of the gluteal muscles and the anatomy comprising thighs not fully reach the skin in the area, because there are very effective in the middle insulating layer.
and is responsible for a certain age that women look famous "body of Mrs." . Because you must know that in fact there is a body of Mrs. . When we think of "a lady", we are not representing a newly married twentysomething, but the image of a woman who is averaging its fifth decade of life and the mother of three or four children. She has menstruated three hundred fifty times, and has been pregnant for about three years, adding the periods of all pregnancies.
All this means that your body has been a tremendous amount of sex hormones. And the influence of that almost industrial amount of estrogen and progesterone, the layer of fat to nine years (when the ovaries virtually did not work) had in his buttocks a thickness of three or four millimeters, and no more than two or three in her thighs like the little boy we had put to her side, measure now, after that amount of hormones produced for about thirty-three years of ovarian activity and dozens of months of placental activity (excluding contraceptives that could be consumed or sex hormones as therapy he could have prescribed her gynecologist) about six inches in his buttocks, four five of thickness in his thighs, two on the back, one and a half in his arms and breasts, and eight to twelve in her womb.
And everything we say again is normal and physiological. It is the result of the sin of gluttony, but to be a human female which has been prepared each month to conceive, and because of that preparation has been able to give life to one, two, or three or more new humans, which is no small thing.

When I tell this to my patients, all of protest, "having to menstruate every month, breed and give birth several times, and over, having to endure the" fat ugly sex ... "But the protest low
decibels when they reported that sexual lean menstruating or giving birth could not even speak and breathe. Come on, that if women do not enjoy the privilege of being surrounded by so great protection, neither you nor I exist. Almost certainly.

sexual fat is not "a punishment from God," but a formidable defense mechanism that He has given us humans (like all other viviparous vertebrate species). I say "us" because you woman "support it", BUT IS EVERYONE. It is an added protection to ensure the perpetuation of the species.
The woman's body, like those of all other females of the building is designed to perfection to allow the privilege to father our children. The Creator has not forgotten anything. Even the smallest details are carefully planned, all possible contingencies are foreseen.
An embryo or fetus in the womb supports almost everything bad that could happen, thanks to that awful planning. Isolated from the rest of the world (and even his own mother in many ways), tolerate, for example, that her mother eat poorly and much, or not eat anything for a long time. Suffering from illness and accidents without ever realizing that she has suffered ... But something would not survive, which occur an end to their budding life, that the temperature inside the mother drop to hypothermia. That's why women have been surrounded by a layer of an optimal material insulation temperature, some famous and not at all well-considered FAT FEMALE SEXUAL, so if you, being pregnant, forced by circumstances to be exposed to intense cold have time to go to seek shelter before they cool the internal environment and a child who is producing perish.
women, thanks to the wonderful properties of that layer of fat sex, have the privilege of being more EUTERMICAS than men. I mean I have a lot easier to maintain a constant internal temperature regardless of ambient temperature too.
is highly probable that some of our ancient ancestors, while pregnant, has faced the contingency (a bumpy ride, an act of war or natural disaster) than having to go to the weather many days of winter. If it had not been surrounded by the thermal grease, your child probably had not been born, and neither do we, by extension.



always delights me to think that is a miracle of coincidence that I may be writing this and you reading it. I mean, we both born. None of our ancestors have died without having had the opportunity to play that was in line with our ancestors, none of our ancestors, millions and millions as we shall see, he died before childbearing and everyone has had the ability and chance. If only one of them had missed the event neither you nor I would be here today. To have a faint idea of \u200b\u200bhow many have gone before us told him that only five hundred years ago they lived, most probably in Europe, Asia or Africa, the components of our twentieth-generation back to what we might call, somewhat abusing language, our "dieciseisbistatarabuelos" -. And you have not the faintest idea, probably because it has never happened to the calculation of those dieciseisbistatarabuelos has thus sepal: "ONE MILLION FORTY EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY-SIX" . And so, as you read (and will remove the accounts: two parents, four grandparents, eight great-grandparents, sixteen great-grandparents ...). And if you count the vast number of offspring of the formidable relatives discover that almost 2.1 million people mix their genes in just the last hundred years so that today we are here at this time, with this figure (I mean it behooves us related to genetic) and in that spirit. And we're talking about only five centuries, that are not absolutely nothing when you consider that more than forty thousand centuries as man has inhabited this planet. Surely, somehow, we are brothers.



But not only to isolate women from the low temperature used sexual fat, is also a great safe and excellent accumulation of energy reserves in case, because of greater strength, while gestation had elapsed difficulty obtaining food on a daily basis and sufficient.
In such cases, on the occasion of a famine, for example, pregnancy may proceed through the reserve bank which means the formidable layer of fat hormone- .

is likely that currently comes to mind the image of that friend who has had four children and continues to maintain his body as thin as the day she married twenty-five years.
is true: women and there. Are scarce, but there are enough for you all know a few.
There are women who in spite of age and regardless of the number of children they have begotten, still keeping the same dimensions perimeter that had to end the second decade of his life. And that has an explanation. Have noticed that if you know more than one, all are alike in one thing: they are extremely slim. It is as if they had fat under the skin, and in fact is what happens. They are born carrying a genetic error, as we have seen. Lack of vital sexual fat, and then also the ability to store fat hyper reserve should they (and most do) carbohydrates.

In some other genetic error is otherwise. They suffer from what doctors called lipodystrophy, which means that in some parts of his body lack the blubber as beneficent. Commonly are lean from the waist up, and normal or generally thick waist down (the provision is rarely the reverse), which makes them aesthetically unfortunate.

Finally there are others who have a sexual fat thinner than usual, and at the same time a difficulty, a disability or genetic metabolic know, to store fat reserves, which prevents the normal thickening of adipose tissue that has to be the logical consequence of the passing years.
Are these women "enviable" and grandmothers to be held in a "perfect" just cared a little, or more generally without any special care. Many of them end up giving advice on television or in women's publications, pretending to believe that if you follow them achieve a body like that of them (and if does not is because you are not a stupid fickle).
But they are like, what we do, do not pay attention .

can never imagine the discussions I had with so many women seem or believe being fat (or having lost weight have discovered a body is not svelte, perhaps it was not even in the most splendid time of his youth, or, worse, slender but not satisfied, and still think they should "lose weight a little.")
And not telling you how I argued with those that seem quite fat (thank God not many), trying to convince them that they are so that your body is , which is their fair share because of its mixture genetics, age, circumstances and physical activity. That is the body that have been played luck.
I mean, the time it takes, if you have not been fortunate to have a graceful body, it is certain that some other basis must be able to show that physical disharmony is eclipsed. That when a woman gets to have the body rightful OPTIMO has the body for it, and that, by definition, can not improve the optimum. That
ever female seduction begins with a beautiful body, but by sympathy, common sense, culture, kindness, humor, ... That spirit of helping both eyes sparkling with mischief, intelligence, understanding and tenderness probably arouse more passion than the more slender body contouring. Because those who are smart know that a slim body ever will be, but a pair of eyes and never stop to reflect what today reflect.

But no case: achievement rarely persuade them, and continue (poor women) wandering from doctor to doctor trying to find that "given the key and fix" the problem that haunts.



dream that all my colleagues who are dedicated to guide fat women (or those that appear, or who believe they are) in the ways of the slim, read this scenario (they may not all blog), and then reconsider reading it. That
promise to stop women , if you follow their advice may make the body of "ladies eternal" . Or the ladies thick body, not slender, they have to achieve the ethereal thinness that never had, if they follow his instructions.

Having in mind that aesthetic harmony is the product of a fortunate combination of genes, age, activity and circumstances, never will, nor science seems the most lucid and gifted professionals.