blog index for
thinners
err is human.
contribute to error is a vile attitude ...
and take advantage of those mistakes is unforgivable.
Anecdote of office:
few years ago came to see a fat woman, with her husband.
After the usual preliminary talk, I said "I have one hundred and twelve kilos thinner.
That revelation shocked me: she looked fat, but very well made and fresh (it was quite high and graceful.) I did not understand how, after losing such an amount, could be shown as well as healthy, but as her husband does not contradicted, by the way I took it.
When the scale-up and as I have said that I can not convince anyone in a tris-behind the futility of it, start weighing my patients, as is what we are accustomed, when weighed, I said, the faithful marked eighty-five kilos.
- How much has come to regret the time that was more fat? - I asked for an answer terrible. "Eighty-five ... today is the day when I weighed more," he said very loose body.
- How, I say just under one hundred and twelve?
"Yes, true ... but adding the kilos I downloaded each time. The first time I got diet twelve, then I gained, the second nine, but recovered, and so, adding each downturn (sic) and get to the hundred and twelve that I said-(the fearless husband).
I started to laugh, the "joke" struck me as witty ... but it was a joke. It was the first and only time you hear such a confession-this very seriously and with absolute conviction-(Al After was a good way of seeing the glass half full).
Everything was as just one of hundreds of anecdotes that I can count.
This and many others have made me think. I have searched many explanations for this way of acting, I mean more diets dieting as if this were the reason of living for the vast majority of those who, for example, read this blog (you've read some of my arguments about .)
and time, and one, who lives thinking about these things, you are going on new ideas, all based on the blissful "evidence."
In the months of July and August 2007, convalescing a small surgery, and having much time to reflect, I arrived at a conclusion which I found very useful. To provide further evidence of the reasoning I went to this new wonder of the internet and looked at various forums and websites where the focus is on fat, obesity and methods of attack scenarios. The hours I spent reading the different opinions of the participants of each and the authors of each page allowed me to confirm the new hypothesis, and to excuse at first daunting, repetition in attempts carriers so troubling conflict of outs, and changes in strategies, which are taken at first with enthusiasm overwhelming, and abandoned soon after a crushing disappointment (although the results appear to be, or are, stimulants).
And here is the development of this new idea:
There are people who love to go fishing, we call them fishermen, hunters those who prefer to go hunting, brokers to who like the foot races, and those who swim, swimmers , etc. etc.
Why go fishing anglers, often to defy bad weather terrible, if not get very excited when the fishing is good, not too sad when bad? The answer is simple: because they are excited about what the ceremony is just "go fishing", because they know that for five or six hours will be alone with his soul in the vast quiet of the river or the soothing sound of the sea, purging his mind of the problems faced every day by carrying therapeutic navigate the path of "think of nothing", even though they know that nobody believes the old excuse of "I love to eat what I catch." Why
will climb the mountain, if it would be much easier and less tiring and risky to reach the summit by helicopter? Because they love the pleasure that I report the climbing as a sport, feeling full of risks and away from the rest of the world very close contact with nature, the small gains they get to the end of each stage of the ascent of the enormous satisfaction of reaching the summit.
And that could explain why runners, and players, and ...
Extrapolating, then how to call that "going to lose weight" once, and another and another and another?. .. thinning, of course. Are those who set a thousand times and subsistence allowances, knowing in her innermost being that they will return to the top, and the joy of some success will last as little as the sadness of a failure. And the reason for such attitudes, that anyone you do not understand anything about the subject might label as illogical explanations have already seen in the development of the blog: need to remove the guilt of having "gotten it" paying for the effort of being starved for a while, or seeking conform to the other ... and comply with the trite "Yes, I'm fat ... but I'm dieting," or overshadowing the tremendous conflict of fatness to seek, by the method of trial and error, the diet "defeat."
You see, my dear reader, the time is making things increasingly complex.
I ask humbly for forgiveness to those who did not know at the time to understand. Now the question seems to me quite clear.
So what would be the upshot of all this?
Well if you like to go fishing, not fish but nothing to run but do not mean more than getting to the point of departure to hunt even though you know you're going to give away all the pieces you get ...; a diet even though you know that sooner or later will recover what you lost: FORWARD! (Provided they do not hurt yourself with hooks, not wrecking your joints in the race, do not hurt anyone with an erratic shot ... or do not get sick by malalimentarte or intoxicate with the harmful anorectic).
THANKS TO ALL THE READERS OF THIS BLOG, AND YOU ENCOURAGE ME, AND YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH MY OPINION, TO THE MANY WHO WERE MY FRIENDS, AND, ESPECIALLY, TO UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS A THOUSAND TIMES BETTER THAN THE MOST CRUEL TRUTH COMFORTER OF SCAMS.
Y PERDÓN POR SI, QUIZÁ, TAN SOLO HE CONTRIBUIDO A
Dr. Cesáreo Rodríguez
0 comments:
Post a Comment