Hells Kitchen Usa, Is It Staged

blog index for

MEDICAL MYTHS
(never blindly believe everything you read or everything you hear ... even in what is noted in this blog)

4 º MYTH: IN TIME TO TAKE OR ANTIULCER ANTIGASTRÍTICOS

Here we will have to give a brief description of the operation elemental stomach.

We said that the stomach is the second portion of the 'digestive tracts. " That is after the esophagus and is the widest of all tube. That he performs an important function namely, the food we eat is mixed there, for different periods depending on the quality of them, with a highly acidic humor to the same stomach makes, and that is called gastric juice. " With all that, after the time variable, it forms a slurry called chyme, which later passes more or less speed, according to which the chyme fat you have, the small intestine for absorption (digestion). That
as acid humor made him special cells that are in almost the entire inner surface of the stomach. But everything is so well thought out, that potent acid that does not attack the very wall that develops, the same wall produces a mucus lining that completely and that is resistant to the powerful corrosive agent. If the protective mucus is altered in some way (in quality or quantity), gastric juice attacks his own "factory" so that occur from small to large swells (that is gastritis), or directly destruction of the elements that form the wall (these are the ulcers), which is involved a bacterium called Helicobacter Pylori, which, according to recent studies and evidence, is the producer of them. Such bacteria must be destroyed with antibiotics and a strong decrease in gastric acidity (if thirty years ago someone had predicted that sometime gastric ulcers would be "cured with antibiotics," had gone to a psychiatric institute.)
has always known the pain or "heartburn" (burning, acid-derived word Piro = fire-), is fought by eating any food, especially dairy products, which absorb much of gastric deljugo
- especially dairy products, that being "alkaline (the opposite of acid) inhibit the
more quickly, the problem is alleviated.

For many decades, pharmacologists have studied substances to avoid these symptoms (or that were already removed when installed.)
They discovered that the calcium or magnesium hydroxide, prepared in convenient pill form could be carried in pockets or purses, rapidly inhibited the action of such corrosive acid. Later they added aluminum hydroxide, which is unique in almost replace the "protective mucus." (Formerly used baking soda, which, being alkaline nullified the action of acid gastric juice. But after it was discovered that the stomach obstinately tried to keep the acid when the bicarbonate inhibited, and compensated redoubling acid production, it outlawed. The same is happening now with the milk, which also be alkaline, though much less than soda, and produces the same reaction gastric him).

the late seventies, there is a revolution: a drug appears, the simetidina , which decreases the production of hydrochloric acid (the main component of "gastric juice"). A few years later, trying to eliminate the side effects of the drug, ranitidine establishing (still used). At the end of the eighties came to light so-called "pump inhibitors protons ", chemical products, acting molecularly prevent the correct formation of hydrochloric acid. The first was the omeprazole, followed by other "Prazoles" , all members of the same pharmaceutical family, trying to diminish, more and more side effects (as does the science of pharmacology).
Laboratories submitted to us, and we began to prescribe them. And it is here comes the reason for this talk: How to prescribe?
When each visitor received a doctor who introduced me to his "new and wonderful prazol, they listened to the patient debía consumirlos a la mañana y en ayunas.
-¡¿Cómo en ayunas y a la mañana, están locos?!- les protestaba (Si habré discutido con ellos…).
Paso a explicarle el porqué de mi acalorada cuestión.
Supongamos que un padeciente de gastritis toma, por ejemplo, un comprimido de pantoprazol de 20 miligramos (es la dosis usual) a las siete de la mañana (es la hora en la que uno suele estar en ayunas). El organismo, lentamente, lo va metabolizando y eliminando, de tal suerte que cuando llegan las 23:00 hs. y se va a dormir, en su cuerpo no quedan más que 5 o 6 miligramos.
La comida, cualquiera, produce un efecto antiácido al absorber gran parte This gastric juice to begin the first major step of digestion, as discussed above. Obviously the antacid effect is more or less long according to the quality of food or drink is consumed. That I know well who have or have had gastritis or ulcers, when they start the annoying symptoms (pain, burning ...), a snack or a drink of something are "miracle cure" for a while (the symptoms go away instantly).
Then at night, while we are sleeping, our stomach is empty for seven or eight hours, during that time there is nothing to mitigate the corrosive action of gastric juice so. Pantoprazole has that action, but at that time there is so little circulating in our economy, which, practically, the effect of any cause is negligible.
For all this: THE PRAZOLES BE TAKEN A WHILE BEFORE GOING TO SLEEP.
If anyone reading this is taking, or know someone who uses these drugs, rather than in the morning Take them before going to bed. In three or four days notice the huge difference in treatment outcome. Thirty

first delivery: "DA HYPERTENSION SYMPTOMS? WHAT?"

Replacement Boat Seat Covers

Myth Three Myth Four Myth Two

blog General Index

MYTHS IN MEDICINE
(no sick more intractable than just "think" that is)

3 º MYTH: ATTACKS OF LIVER

Who has not had on several occasions a "liver attack?
But when the question refers to a detail, is that only some have been something related to hepatobiliary complex: a biliary colic (in some people, stones form-small solid-concretions within the gallbladder. In a determined time one of these computations is beyond the organ in question, and gets into the "common bile duct, which is the small tube that carries bile to the large digestive tracts. This foreign body within such a small canal, makes its walls to contract, is espasmodicen-producing an almost unbearable pain), colic, we said, but that is not "an attack of liver." What they have suffered a setback is nothing that has given the gallbladder. To say that a biliary colic is a liver attack, is like saying that cystitis is an attack of kidney. The gallbladder, unlike the bladder, is "glued" to the liver, but physiologically are equally distant from two, the bladder serves to store the urine and urination urination, gallbladder to store bile between digestion and digestion.

One, last night, has eaten fried eggs, and this morning has risen to "annoying pain in the liver, nausea, vomiting and headache. Those around diagnoses with the greatest of certainties, "This is a liver attack" (it is very sure that you ever felt or diagnosed, or worse, a doctor made the diagnosis). But they are all wrong.

Here are the causes of error, and perdonémoslos, what do no evil.
Let's talk about basic hepatobiliary physiology.
Bile is a liquid (humor) digestive wonderful, and cholesterol is the fundamental component. All that the small intestines absorb (that's "digestion") must be soluble in water. Fats could not be digested if there were no bile (Come on, that without bile, neither would we). She, containing soap, makes fat soluble in water intake (like the soap we use for the toilet). That makes them absorbable soluble, digestible I mean.
The egg, to continue the example started this speech So, it is "Colagogo" meaning which requires that you provide a lot of gallbladder bile, so it can be assimilated to the maximum. But here comes
culture. It is quite usual that those who do eat fried eggs accompanied by a lot of bread (for sopar in just coagulated yolk-rich are not rich many more things than that-).
And when you eat fats and starches, is demanding the most of your digestive capacity (one might say, without trying to exaggerate the speculation, which is "abusing it.")
Eating too much fat (fried egg has many), the gallbladder does provide a lot of bile, which along with much starch makes a mess. Because the starch never fully digested, so the surplus reaches the large intestine before being eliminated. But it happens that the intestine is full of bacteria (do not panic, they are friends, and to provide us with the essential vitamin K, among other things), full of bacteria, he said, for which the starch is the tastiest of desserts. Then I "eat" as we call it fermentation, and the fermentation (like all fermentation) produces gases. And it also happens that the excess bile reaches the colon, and, remember, the bile has soaps. And you know what happens when we join diluted soapy water and gases. Yes, sir: there is foam, and foam formed by bubbles very small (like beer foam), literally "inflated" the large intestine, which occurs at the first "symptom of morning-after": abdominal distention.
The colon is divided into four sections: the "up" (the first portion, starts a little above the right groin, it is colgadito "Appendix" - and rises to the height of the liver). There is folded into a very acute angle (in homage to its famous neighbor, is called "hepatic flexure), and begins the second leg" of the transverse colon. " This is a lot shorter, and goes more or less horizontally to the left. There, at the height of the spleen, is another angle, this time, due to the proximity of that body, is called "splenic" (Greek splen , in Castilian is translated as "spleen") and almost is never as sharp as the liver. There starts the penultimate section, "the bottom", which ends in the fourth, the "sigmoid", so called because its path is very similar to the Greek S called sigma ("oid" is a suffix that means: like ...).
entire colon is surrounded by nerve ganglia that coordinate perfectly their movements, which are called peristalsis, which have the function of transporting your content from the beginning of the first leg to finish fourth, then have to be evacuated.
But when the colon is filled with a tight foam (as we talked about above), the matter becomes more complicated, because the foam is plastic, then advance when a section of intestine pushes toward the end, but back when that portion is relaxed and all the work starts again. And this constant struggle causes pain, pain that becomes more apparent where more foam to accumulate: in the hepatic flexure (the foam is lighter than water so it meets at that angle, which is the highest part of the colon) And here is the second "sign of the morning-after" THE PAIN TO THE HEIGHT OF THE LIVER, everyone graciously attributes this to the noble viscera (poor liver).

Many people suffer from recurrent headaches (headaches), which usually follows, apart from intolerance to light and noise, nausea and vomiting (which in medicine is called "migraine"), which in the vast majority of those who suffer due to intolerance to ferment starch. So here are presented the third and fourth "symptoms morning after "headache, and nausea and vomiting.

With all this we fully installed "liver attack" , and I hope I convinced that the poor liver HAVE NOT HAD NOTHING TO DO IN THIS MATTER.

(I know the topic is too difficult to explain without drawings through, so I apologize if I have not found a simpler way to do it).

comes in. Then the "remedy for liver attacks" drops or tablets antispasmodic compounds (usually "hyoscine" or "propinox" ...) and analgesics (almost always "dipyrone" "Clonixinate lysine" or "paracetamol" ...).
And you take a composite of these, and soon after symptoms disappear.
The reasoning seems logical to infer, "I had those symptoms, I took a" remedy for the liver "and the symptoms disappeared. Then I had a liver attack from eating fried eggs last night.
And everything returns to be wrong, wrong.

Antispasmodics decrease (and may even stop) the movement of smooth muscles that form the fundamental part of all digestive tracts, so that the bowel ceases to fight, and obviously hurting, and the stomach to cause nausea or vomiting.
Analgesics relieve pain, headache, and pain that may be small in the hepatic flexure of the colon.
But it happens that the liver does not have smooth muscles, because the liver is a gland SOLID.

Abdominal pain can be a very important symptoms, vital. We can not trivializing diagnosed, very loose body - liver is an attack!

My family consists of five members: my three children, now have 35, 32 and 31 years (the last two are married and live in yours) my wife and me. And I swear that in all these years, none of the five said, ever, "my tummy hurts." Moreover, in this house has never entered an analgesic-antispasmodic. No way, no shape or form, never part of our home kit. The reason is simple: do not eat this meal, except on rare occasions, here do not drink milk or yogurt, and orange fruit has never been a usual in our practice (because you know that milk, yogurt and orange fill the gut of a foam like wheat flour and produce the famous and annoying bloating and cramps).

PARADOX: most Sometimes the liver is ill, the patients who consult us almost never suspect that the patient is the liver.

And with that ends the myth of the attacks the liver (Will it end the myth?). Thirty

delivery: "TAKE THAT TIME OR ANTIULCER ANTIGASTRÍTICOS"

Stiff Neck Once A Month

Myth

blog index for

MEDICAL MYTHS
(every thing the time and place, is what makes the world go)

2 º MYTH: IN WHAT TIME TO TAKE inflammatory, analgesic and fever?

This is a rather complex subject (simple, yet complex, a paradox-)
Let's talk about basic gastric physiology.
digestive tubes are composed of the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, small intestine (jejunum and ileum), large intestine (colon), sigmoid colon and rectum.
The stomach is next to the esophagus, is the first portion completely intraabdominal tube (the esophagus passes mostly through the thorax). Is an enlargement of the tubes, the largest in terms of diameters. And it has, en su última porción, una válvula, que se denomina píloro , que se cierra herméticamente en el momento de la digestión, para transformarlo en un saco en donde los alimentos consumidos se pondrán en contacto con el “jugo gástrico” (líquido extremadamente ácido que produce el mismo estómago), durante mucho tiempo, a fin de desnaturalizarlos y transformarlos en absorbibles (esa absorción se hará en los intestinos delgados), para, así, hacerlos digeribles, con lo que cumplirán su función de nutrientes.
Todo lo que comemos, gracias a esa fundamental función gástrica se transforma en “quimo” (masa semilíquida, homogénea creamy or pasty). After the formation of chyme, the pylorus was open, just, to pass a small portion of that mass with the object of special cells in the duodenum to analyze. If the chemo is too much fat, the pylorus will open very soon, so that everyone leaves the stomach slowly and to give time to the gallbladder bile to send necessary to make all water soluble fats (no crosses bowel wall if it is not soluble in water-soluble-). If the chemo has little or no fat, the opening is made very quickly and completely.
I think everything is expressed simply and thoroughly (no more to say).

Now comes the problem.
Everybody "knows" that anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics and / or fever reducers, be taken with "a full stomach." Moreover, the prospects of these medications, usually goes like this. BUT IT IS INCORRECT, IT IS A MYTH.
Here's why:
All these types of drugs are gastro (stomach hurt to produce gastritis, ulcers and sometimes very serious). Those who have "all the awards" are piroxicam and aspirin . But everyone else is guilty to a greater or lesser extent.
But many are very effective.
-A calms me a lot, but "I destroy my stomach." What do I do?
"It's very simple, take an empty stomach, accompanied by a full glass of water just before meals.
This simple tip works wonders.
Here's how.
When the stomach is empty, the bottom valve (pylorus) is open, so that what we drink, saliva, gastric juice and the same will not accumulate on it.
If you then take one tablet anti-inflammatory, along with a full glass of water, will not give time to the pylorus to close, so water pill and continue to the small intestine.
There will be absorbed and diluted in five liters of blood, so that when the blood to flow to nourish the stomach wall, the drug concentration is so small that you can not do much damage.
But if we take a full stomach as the valve is closed, the drug will be absorbed by the stomach wall, thereby injure the mucous layer that protects it from its own acidity, and there will be "damage ".
At the moment the anti-inflammatory, antirheumatic, that we use are diclofenac, nimesulide and meloxicam (there are others, but they are not commonly used.) All are gastro, but when taken in recommended doses, WITH EMPTY STOMACH, AND PERSONS WITH A FULL GLASS OF WATER, and, better, if you eat back, I assure you that their tolerance is increased tenfold. Try and tell me the results. Moreover, if aspirin upsets your stomach makes, but you must take it because his cardiologist or neurologist, or your clinician has recommended it, do so from morning fasting, dissolved, and accompanied by a full glass of liquid, and I referring to the common aspirin, not those who "come coated with enteric coating, which are much more expensive and whose gastro I am suspicious.
Then we talked.


Next delivery: (this time) "THE ATTACKS OF LIVER"

Does Masturnating Give You Dark Circles

a

Blog index for

MEDICAL MYTHS

(As a child, medical and crazy, we all have some)

That last statement is a genius, and a universal genius, because there is no one who can be definitely against.
But I'm sure of "doctor" is what we all need a little more.
Who does not think about the problem health tells his interlocutor? (Even up when the speaker is a doctor).
Who does not advise anyone suffering from something, do something that he has done well when he suffered from something similar?
Who ever has not tried to dissuade a patient not to take what the doctor ordered, because he, or someone you know, the same medication you have done wrong?

Medicine is as old as the human race.
In 99.9% of the time, "from day one" was empirical. In 0.01% of the time, in recent centuries, it was scientific (but still we could not get us empiricism of the head. So one might ask, by the way a mea culpa , what doctor does not act, even once a day, empirically?

All this might seem to nice, if it was not a lot of our opinions are wrong because they often use reasoning based on our "experience" rather than science, and when I do not discount the experience of pre-medical life (is that doctors are human, and, after all, having studied to learn to think like doctors, gives us the license ...).

Empiricism centuries has created a host myths, many of whom have been banished (now, for example, women can bathe, and even in the pool while they are menstruating, which was practically a suicide until no more than a few decades).
But many other myths are still alive and kicking, and still held by the same doctors (including specialists in the topics covered by the myth that produces excess fat calories is a good example, we have seen -).

For all this, from today, we try to think scientifically to eradicate most they can from the myths that still persist. I beg the readers of the blog that when a statement on issues they seem dubious medical (or mythical) communicate to me. So try to make more abundant this demystification. And I ask my colleagues for their collaboration.
not going to create a "new medicine", but it is sure going to help many people. At that believes in the myths at face value (eg the "embarrassment" and such nonsense).

1 º MYTH: "DRY HEAT IS GOOD FOR RHEUMATISM, moist heat is bad."

Maybe this is one of the oldest myths.
Since time immemorial humans observed that moisture in the days of their diseased joints were more painful than on dry days. And indeed it does. So much so that the old recommendation to heat-treat these joints more painful than usual, is on condition that the source of that heat is dry:
-Bag with hot sand, or a hair dryer, advises the doctor.
- And the hot water bottle?
- NOOO! that is moist heat.
"But my bag is not punctured. Is new and still sealed.
"But is full of water, and do you know anything wetter than water?
"Well, but ... Can I leave a few days to get me in the hot springs?
- That would be nice ...!
This conversation, much like a "crazy talk", takes place thousands of times per day for patients with joint diseases and their doctors, and many who are reading this, or some of their relatives, have been taken into like terms.
To explain the origin of the absurd (a clear example of what a "erroneous interpretation of the evidence" ).

As we said at the beginning, from the beginning of time men found that on wet days her joint pain became more intense (or hurt their old fractures, or old wounds, surgical or not). Moreover, many people came (and they arrive) to serve as a weather forecast:
's going to rain, is hurting a lot of the bunion ... (And most likely is that accompanies the worsening rain prescient).
And all will see, makes sense.
In the Southern Hemisphere, when wind is north, and in the Northern Hemisphere, when wind is south, as the wind is warm, the air pressure falls rapidly. And along with it increases the relative humidity, because these winds, warmer than they are wet.
What we perceive immediately is moisture. Our economy lacks receptors barometric (atmospheric pressure), unless one has a diseased joint, or an old fracture, or ...
Except in the thorax and abdomen, the rest of our anatomy has the same atmospheric pressure. When there is a sudden drop it, there is an expansion of our fabrics to match the new ambient pressure (which is to take two to three days), and it is this sudden expansion that produced the aggravation of the pain, and NO MOISTURE THAT, GENERALLY, accompanied the pressure drops.

Heat is good in itself because it is muscle relaxant (muscle relaxant). In the rheumatism of the spine, 90% of the component "pain" is due to muscle contracture that occurs to prevent the move, or the affected joints. The good thing is the heat, period. No matter the source of it (the end of the day we are surrounded by a layer of skin completely waterproof right?).

"What kills is the humidity ..." , is a popular voice in the land River Plate. And as the Argentinians speak in eight syllable, up is more poetic to say
"What kills is the sudden drop in atmospheric pressure ..." (definitely that last comment is not smart for us: a nonodecasílabo is counter). But after all: not elegant, but it is true. Next

demystification: "ATTACK OF LIVER"

What Is Incoming Mail Server For Zimbra

twenty-six

Blog index for

latter hypothesis

CHOOSING A GOOD METHOD TO LOSE WEIGHT.

(This is the ninth chapter of my fourth book: "POOR FAT ...!")

When I re-read a few weeks ago, I decided that the last hypothesis should be it. It is a very convenient summary of everything we've talked since that September 17th of the year just ended. But I remember the blog not end here. Taking advantage of this wonderful opportunity that the Internet gives me, I would like us to talk about "medical myths" . Next time we started.

To lose weight, to everything in life,
Let's do it right, or do nothing.

Further back I've said that thinning, including the perpetuation of this state, must be the result of a change in eating habits, never that of a therapeutic rationale.
is very likely that at this time, or a longer, are you eating under certain rules imposed, probably by a professional or a fashion book that you purchased for that purpose (God wills it so read on this blog).
there or will there be a change in their habits, but how do you know if that change is or will be correct?
Physicians, to each disease act in a more or less stereotyped. Both here and in Turkey it comes to heart failure or hypertension, gastritis or rheumatoid arthritis, say some, with the same drugs and same dietary and hygiene advice. Conferences and publications aim to end the improvement or modification of these stereotypes.
This is to better explain what further back you said the cause of the lack of a uniform and universal treatment for obesity is that NOT A DISEASE.
I think now is the time of a must: put your mind what to me is the Decalogue a right method to lose weight, to judge whether what they are doing to (Or will do) is the right thing ...
Or to contribute to the general confusion (at the end of the one is not less than the other).

So let me introduce myself

DECALOGUE PROPER METHODS FOR WEIGHT LOSS

1 - "must be universal"

This is a very important item (although you will see that none of the other nine has waste).
must serve for all, regardless of who decide to undergo it is young or old, healthy or sick from disease. Athlete or a sedentary lifestyle, and whether or not women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
Let: DO NOT HAVE ANY CONTRAINDICATIONS. Those who have contraindications are drugs (or food, when used at doses of medication), and as the fat is NOT a disease, you can not offer the big thing that is likely to be medication (contraindications, say).


2 - "varied BE IN THE QUALITY OF FOOD AND ITS METHOD OF PREPARATION, AND ALMOST NO LIMITS on allowable amounts"

actually slimming method that is based only on food, and which has the ambitious goal "to be the last" definitely should not ban anything that is edible or drinkable and amounts will be sufficiently plentiful, and infrequently regulated food intake, so that everyone can satisfy their hunger (or your appetite) at the time it is. Because if we do not restrict the amounts set schedule but is also "prescribe", and doctors prescribe to treat diseases and THE FAT IS NOT A DISEASE. (You will see from reading this sentence, will gradually convincing).

3 - "MUST RESPECT EACH culinary customs"

This is fundamental. If one intended to be universal is to serve all, say truism. That's "Habit" is fine, but that no change occurs to you ABSOLUTELY ALL customs which have sent their ancestors. That a Jew can eat as they eat the Jews and Romans as a Roman. Fool who claims that an American and an Argentine coma ... and an Argentine like a bird.

4 - "NOTHING TO BE REQUIRED TO ALLOW"

Something unpleasant is fine if it's something temporary (sour, bitter syrup to relieve cough, for example), but if one seeks a dietary reeducation can not bind his counterpart to consume what may be to him worse than a sour and bitter syrup, and over forever. That could be used, and in practice is the perfect excuse in most cases, to leave everything. And even the most tyrannical of doctors must admit: "You're right ...

5 -" WILL BE AVAILABLE TO ALL BUDGET "

This is critical, especially during times we are experiencing (Author's note: the book from which this chapter is taken to add the blog was written in 1992). Many times I've laughed, with apologies for the rudeness and treatments that require a very high economic status in order to be carried out. always remember "The Champagne diet ", explaining in a weekly magazine some years ago, and that was saying panegyrize which was a famous American movie star (I honestly do not remember who). Poor silly tricksters!, Or Poor deluded deceivers!, You choose what best suits you.

6 - "THE BALANCE OF NUTRIENTS TO BE MADE BY THE SAME AGENCY"

This is a very special. We are equipped
animals to survive a wonderful computer. Our agency is responsible for almost magical to incorporate or reject foods that do or do not make us lack. Including, remember, the incorporation more carbohydrate than those required for daily subsistence, will be converted into fat in reserve for possible lean times due to a physiological mechanism and normal (which deny fat people, and they understand). But humans, by a physiological inability of the species, we can not keep reserves of proteins and fats we eat, for possible future periods of deprivation.
If anyone believes and asserts that eating lots of fats and proteins, humans can save them for when missing, please let me explain the intimate mechanism of this hoarding. Infinitely grateful (and blog readers, of course) this co ..

7 - "should allow, with some frequency, errors and transgressions"

No one is free of "sin" of the temptations and social commitment "unavoidable", where everything is provided for eating and drinking is holy it should.
A good way to lose weight and keep it off permanently, you can delete the enjoyment, but never the pleasure that holds the food. No one is fat because he ate a lot of fresh bread in the Christmas of 98. There is not even fat that is because on holiday "ate everything." Remember that, please, has been EVERYDAY AS POSSIBLE and not what has gotten fat.

8 - Promote a SLIMMING SLOW "

feel that this is not going to like anything but what you can do.
A slow weight loss is essential to allow adaptation to a new physical structure, a new body shape, thus avoiding an abrupt change in personality, as we saw, is unbearable, and the leading cause one of the bounce, oddly enough.

9 - "ALLOW GET EVERY BODY, NATURAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES YOUR BEST

This will be put off to the dangerous supplied "weights and heights, which should be banished by completely unscientific, and we've talked enough in the Tenth delivery (Ninth Hypothesis), although, I correct myself: it is never enough.

10 - "BE PREDISPOSE perpetuate ACHIEVEMENTS"

You already know this, but it should be remembered whenever possible, that another of the main reasons for the failures is the "targeting error" that fat people are: They do not want to lose weight , but never to fatten after thinning.
The end of a good nutritional approach is to make "eating well" is a habit.


If what you are doing is consistent with all items of the Decalogue, go ahead, everything will be fine if you have patience . And if you think it has no need, do not worry, creársela must be the work of the good doctor who is consulting or queried. Be confident.

If different from everyone, but with most, there is always a chance that everything goes as you expect.

If you do not agree with almost none, I suggest you abandon the attempt (even if you think you're getting great results) and wait for the chance to find a new path.

better times now.

Below I have listed prominently, the Decalogue.
Print it, frame it and hang it in the most visible of his home.


DECALOGUE CORRECT WEIGHT LOSS METHOD

1. Should be universal.

2. BE varied.

3. MUST respect their customs.

4. NOTHING WILL BE REQUIRED.

5. BE ACCESSIBLE TO ALL POCKET.

6. FAIL TO WHOM IT IS YOUR BODY BALANCE OF NUTRIENTS it deems necessary.

7. ALLOW errors and transgressions.

8. Promote a SLIMMING SLOW.

9. NATURALY GET AUTOMATICALLY ALLOW THE BODY THAT THE GENES AND THE LIFE YOU HAVE PREDESTINATED.

10. ACHIEVEMENTS perpetuate biased.

Next: "Myths in medicine"

HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL!